Re: GSOC 2012

2012-03-27 Thread Andy Lester
and dumped some old timers to > make room; dunno if this applies to TPF, I know MacPorts got rejected solely > on that basis though. Sorry, I didn't mean to stir this all up again. I retract my query in hopes it will stanch the impending meta-discussions. Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- A

Re: GSOC 2012

2012-03-27 Thread Andy Lester
d they not apply? Or a combination of the two? xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #56712] [BUG] --optimize causes perl6 to segfault during make

2009-09-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:22:17PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > > > > > On Tue Jul 08 20:56:02 2008, s1n wrote: > > > > When trying to use the --optimize flag, bu

Re: [perl #56712] [BUG] --optimize causes perl6 to segfault during make

2009-09-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
ctually, all those ASSERT_ARGS checks aren't used in the --optimize build anyway. Applying the following patch should enable them, assuming that's what is actually intended. --- /parrot-svn/config/init/optimize.pm 2009-09-21 08:55:56.0 -0400 +++ parrot-andy/config/init/opt

Rakudo.org upgrade

2009-02-26 Thread Andy Lester
on Movable Type on rakudo.org now, and I haven't set up a new account for you, please let me know and I'll set one up. Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #53494] [BUG] --parrot_is_shared=0 IS shared?

2009-02-22 Thread Andy Dougherty
, you mean here, but that's ok. > 2. Allow all keys to be given at the Configure.pl cmdline as in perl5. >Append (Apply after hints), Undefine and Define. See the related discussion in [perl #42412]. (I've updated RT with the relevant link.) In any case, I won't have any time to do anything parrot-related for at least the next several weeks, so I'm afraid I can't be of further help here. -- Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu

Re: [perl #47940] [CAGE] mk_native_pbc stale

2009-02-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
her or not the perl used to run Configure.pl has long double support or not. Hence I conclude that having a perl compiled with long double support isn't necessary. It does look like there's a JIT bug somewhere -- probably, Configure.pl should simply refuse to try JIT if you insist on building with non-standard data types, but that's a different issue. -- Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu

Re: [perl #46179] [TODO] Remove GC code depending upon -D40 before parrot 1.0

2009-02-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
s) but leaving the -D40 branch as a possible debugging tool. -- Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu

Re: [svn:parrot] r36057 - in trunk: . config/auto config/auto/format config/gen/config_h include/parrot src t/compilers/imcc/syn t/op

2009-01-27 Thread Andy Dougherty
ignbit() (which, alas, perl 5 doesn't probe for). Some of these functions might only be available under certain compiler options or with certain extra libraries, depending on how a particular system attempts to adhere to different standards, but it's probably worth trying them. -- Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu

Re: [PATCH] Add .trim method

2009-01-12 Thread Andy Lester
On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote: How about .trim(:start) and .trim(:end)? And .trim(:both) for orthogonality. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Rakudo in Perl culture

2009-01-08 Thread Andy Lester
On Jan 8, 2009, at 3:11 PM, chromatic wrote: I can't read the word "Purdue" without thinking "Year of the Purdue Wonder Chicken" -- but try working that into Perl 6 advocacy. Except that's Perdue. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Rakudo in Perl culture

2009-01-08 Thread Andy Lester
ttp://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJZmdob0mzA2gRTpkRAqidAJ9bG6olYr+HZZosOG75BiM77SWEoQCeLxns 5jxJ3qOuWNDlfqiwSxmIm8k= =7VJE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Purdue-pm mailing list purdue...@pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/purdue-pm -- Andy Le

Re: Ticket #105 (NULL checks)

2008-12-31 Thread Andy Lester
On Dec 31, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Andy Dougherty wrote: We can solve it by getting rid of the attribute_nonnull decorations and replacing them with assert()s. An even better solution is to keep the attribute_nonnull and also add asserts. The ARGIN()/ARGOUT() decorators are useful both to GCC

Re: Ticket #105 (NULL checks)

2008-12-31 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, chromatic wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008 12:26:07 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > This is not a hypothetical what-if situation.  I have lost many hours to > > just this situation.  See my long example in ticket RT #50684.  To save > > everyone fr

Re: fudging the headerizer

2008-12-27 Thread Andy Lester
come up with a solution for that somehow. For now, your #ifdefs are getting removed by the headerizer in the commit I'm about to make, so you'll have to live with the compiler warnings, which shouldn't be too odious, I hope? xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.

fudging the headerizer

2008-12-27 Thread Andy Lester
This patch http://www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34423 is not a long-term solution. The headerizer has to get run at will. Infinoid, can you tell me more about those ifdefs so I can make the headerizer happy? Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.

Re: For your encouragement

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Lester
s what people choose to see. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: For your encouragement

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Lester
a problem? (I don't want to go through the trouble of installing a local MT just to check that. :-) No, I'm not current. xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: For your encouragement

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Lester
sucks. It's on my to-do list to fix. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: For your encouragement

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Lester
On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Simon Cozens wrote: I just ran this code, which worked with the expected results: Beautiful. Posted to Perlbuzz. http://perlbuzz.com/2008/12/database-access-in-perl-6-is-coming-along-nicely.html xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdan

Re: [perl #59660] Storable-2.13 requirement breaks build on OpenSolaris

2008-11-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
significant way. I was just trying to help keep the entry barrier low for others. But I don't really care very much, so I'll stop now. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #59660] Storable-2.13 requirement breaks build on OpenSolaris

2008-11-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
ot-latest.tar.gz cat > patch-2.12 < test.log 2>&1 cd .. mv parrot parrot-2.12 gzip -d -c Storable-2.18.tar.gz | tar -xf - cd Storable-2.18 $perl Makefile.PL make make install cd .. # Build using Storable 2.18 gzip -d -c parrot-latest.tar.gz | tar -xf - cd parrot $perl

Re: [perl #60312] [BUG] OpenBSD Smolder test failures

2008-11-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 03 November 2008 09:38:11 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > 3. 1 of the tests appears to fail depending on how the OS initial- > > > cases 'Inf'. Again, could this be addressed in a hints file? > > >

Re: [perl #60312] [BUG] OpenBSD Smolder test failures

2008-11-10 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 03 November 2008 09:38:11 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > I wonder if this patch fixes things. Certainly it does no harm on my box. > Parrot_signbit() already exists in the platform files, so we might as well > use it. > --

Re: [perl #60312] [BUG] OpenBSD Smolder test failures

2008-11-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
on getting me accounts on them > and, if that comes through, I'll be able to post Configure.pl and make > output. Even more immediately useful would be the 'myconfig' info for each configuration. I designed the file to be useful in precisely this sort of situation. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #60312] [BUG] OpenBSD Smolder test failures

2008-11-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
he same and what's different. > 3. 1 of the tests appears to fail depending on how the OS initial- > cases 'Inf'. Again, could this be addressed in a hints file? This too is a long-standing problem: See [perl #19183]. It stalled pending a decision on whether or not parrot should try to enforce a single spelling of 'Inf' (and 'Nan', etc.) or whether the tests should patch over the issue. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Parrot doesn't build on OS X

2008-11-02 Thread Andy Dougherty
mpiler options were given? All this information, and more, is given in the 'myconfig' file. Attaching that to the problem report would likely be useful. Also, running the core tests might help pinpoint the problem. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #60190] [BUG] problems with the compiler-option "-O2" on a 64bit-system

2008-10-31 Thread Andy Dougherty
ot (and also with parrot -G to turn off garbage collection) and see what's the smallest or simplest failing test case you can find. They might be better candidates for debugging. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: building parrot

2008-10-25 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 15/10/08 Andy Dougherty said: > > > > No file by that name on the box anywhere. > > > > Are you *sure*? I don't know exactly what name you searched for, nor how > > you searched for it, but this is jus

Re: [perl #38823] [BUG] solaris 10 w gcc

2008-10-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Andrew Whitworth wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Andrew Whitworth via RT wrote: > > > >> On Fri Mar 31 13:29:46 2006, leo wrote: > >> > That is, our conf

Re: [perl #38823] [BUG] solaris 10 w gcc

2008-10-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
rs who can double-check this and see > if we still have a problem here? Yes, we still have exactly the same problem. Anyone can check this by editing their perl Config settings and seeing that they get passed through unquestioningly to parrot. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: building parrot

2008-10-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
get for the following commands: nm src/embed.o | grep 'Parrot_new$' nm blib/lib/libparrot.so | grep 'Parrot_new$' -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: building parrot

2008-10-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
ernal' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [miniparrot] Error 1 > > I found one bug online like this, where the fix was not using tcsh, > but I don't use tcsh. Do you have a link for that bug report? I vaguely recall something like that where the tcsh was a red herring -- it was really an environment variable setting -- but I don't recall any more details offhand. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #59660] Storable-2.13 requirement breaks build on OpenSolaris

2008-10-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
tly requires: 2.13. However, if you only have 2.12 and go to CPAN to upgrade, you'll end up with 2.18, which is what chromatic was referring to. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #59660] Storable-2.13 requirement breaks build on OpenSolaris

2008-10-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
rable 2.12 instead of 2.13, and then building with Storable 2.12, also seems to work. That is, there are no significant differences between the generated files. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #59658] Build failure in src/pmc/float.c -- non-constant intiializer

2008-10-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
ance to investigate further this > > evening, if somebody hasn't beaten me to it. > > Yes, that's generated code, it's part of the initialization of MULTIs > declared in a PMC. I was hoping to avoid all those C strings. But, try > r31879. Yes, that works fine. Thanks, -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Parrot mailing list

2008-09-19 Thread Andy Dougherty
ould definitely use it, but I wouldn't want anyone else to be stuck implementing and maintaining it just for my occasional use. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #46681] [TODO] [C] Use strerror_r instead of strerror

2008-09-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
t doesn't. However, perl5's Configure does (at least for Unix systems), so you could just use it's results. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #57920] [PATCH] Suggestion for Parrot Configure test of AIO

2008-09-10 Thread Andy Dougherty
rw-r--r-- 1 jimk jimk 1330 Sep 10 19:58 test_26632.c > -rw-r--r-- 1 jimk jimk 0 Sep 10 19:58 test_26632.out > -rwxr-xr-x 1 jimk jimk 18148 Sep 10 19:58 test_26632 -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #57920] [PATCH] Suggestion for Parrot Configure test of AIO

2008-09-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Will Coleda wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Parrot's also not using AIO anywhere either, so the whole probe is kind of > > pointless right now. > > Instead of spending time fixing a

Re: [perl #57920] [PATCH] Suggestion for Parrot Configure test of AIO

2008-09-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
relying on them as a side effect of this test. At the moment, parrot doesn't use either one, so this does not change any functionality. After this patch, the probe will still be useless, since aio still isn't used anywhere, but perhaps it will now "pass" on Darwin and not h

Re: [perl #39117] [TODO] Using v?snprintf/strlcpy/strlcat when useful

2008-09-07 Thread Andy Dougherty
h forward. As you correctly observe, no one has actually done anything about it yet. That doesn't mean it's not worth doing, however. I'd say it should simply stay as an open ticket. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #57920] [PATCH] Suggestion for Parrot Configure test of AIO

2008-09-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
re/man/man2/aio_return.2 > /usr/share/man/man2/aio_suspend.2 > /usr/share/man/man2/aio_write.2 > > ... what *else* would I need to have AIO available on Darwin? It looks like you already have it available. If you try with my patch in verbose mode, what, exactly, goes wron

Re: [perl #57920] [PATCH] Suggestion for Parrot Configure test of AIO

2008-09-05 Thread Andy Dougherty
'aio' and 'HAS_AIO' entries are always set to some value. I haven't looked for race conditions at all, but with this patch, I'll at least be more confident that it's trying to do what we think it's trying to do. diff -r -u parrot-current/config/auto/aio/

Re: pdd19_pir.pod: See C

2008-08-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
symlinks aren't available on Unix, it falls back to a plain 'ln'. On Win32 versions of perl, lns is usually defined as 'copy'. So the short answer is that, at the moment, without additional Configure.pl work, you can't assume $Config{lns} can be used to make symbolic links for directories. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #58076] Configure tests fail with "Can't store CODE items"

2008-08-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
ls back on using the incorrect value of 'cc' that perl5 was built with. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: My Parrot 0.7.0 patches (cygwin)

2008-08-25 Thread Andy Dougherty
stitution. We used the language's built-in conditional and flow control syntax to express complex ideas. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #57814] Bug Report: Error running make on Red Hat Enterprise v 3.6.9

2008-08-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
is you have different environment variables set under tcsh and bash. This error looks like the one we see when there is an already-installed libparrot.so somewhere that conflicts with the the one you're trying to build. (You don't show the compiler command line that generated the error, so this is only a guess.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #57900] solaris hints no longer work

2008-08-13 Thread Andy Dougherty
argument to the build and run commands. But for now, this at least should work, which is better than it was! Thanks, -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #41508] [BUG] Configure losing flags...

2008-08-13 Thread Andy Dougherty
time inter::progs -- Choose compiler (by Configure.pl command-line option) -- accept hints file settings, whether they apply to this compiler or not. See the discussion in [perl #41195] for some more background and examples. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #41508] [BUG] Configure losing flags...

2008-08-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
; -A eval:symbol=value define symbol to be eval of value -A prepend:symbol=value prepend value to symbol -A undef:symbol define symbol to be 'undef' -A undef:symbol= define symbol to be '' e.g.: -A prepen

Re: Branching

2008-08-05 Thread Andy Lester
eable milestones. Branches that don't merge back to trunk regularly are out of touch with the rest of development. Length of a branch increases technical debt of merging exponentially. xoox, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #41508] [BUG] Configure losing flags...

2008-08-01 Thread Andy Dougherty
7;m not sure what there is to flush out. There's one line in the hints file that has $ccflags = . . . . That's the line that's wrong. It obviously doesn't honor any command-line flags. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #41508] [BUG] Configure losing flags...

2008-08-01 Thread Andy Dougherty
but that configure is ignoring the --ccflags argument. Right. The problem is still exactly the same -- the hints file is still unconditionally overwriting ccflags. Since that hasn't changed, the problem is still there. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56030] Parrot buildfest YAPC::NA::2008 x86 Leopard, build revision 28515 - Configure msg on readline test

2008-07-30 Thread Andy Bach
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:56 PM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andy: Are you still getting the error reported in this ticket? If so, > could you paste output of Configure.pl? okay - attached - here's stderr ... Updated to revision 29896. Macintosh-3:/usr

Re: Parrot_sprintf_c question.

2008-07-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
ontain their actual > implementation > > I don't know whether we expect enough usage of Parrot in mathemetical circles > to be worthwhile adding one of these implementions to our version of sprintf. Perl5 certainly gets used in situations where such issues are relevant. Every tim

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #57386] Configure.pl tests create bad dirs in $TMP

2008-07-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, chromatic wrote: > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:20:33 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > Ahh -- it's just an octal/decimal mix-up. Here's the patch: > > > > --- parrot-current/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t2008-07-30 13:45:19.0 > > -04

[PATCH] Re: [perl #57386] Configure.pl tests create bad dirs in $TMP

2008-07-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
n/alpha/include: Permission denied > > > > I don't recall writing any tests which call for such strange > permissions, but I will nonetheless look into this problem. Ahh -- it's just an octal/decimal mix-up. Here's the patch: --- parrot-current/t/steps/auto_icu-01

Re: [perl #57386] Configure.pl tests create bad dirs in $TMP

2008-07-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
n/alpha/include: Permission denied > > > > I don't recall writing any tests which call for such strange > permissions, but I will nonetheless look into this problem. I suspect it's the icu tests. Or at least a quick 'grep' for 'alpha' and 'include' suggest it's the icu tests. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56716] [TODO]: speed up the configure tests

2008-07-29 Thread Andy Dougherty
al) line 339, at lib/Parrot/Configure.pm line 509 # Looks like you planned 44 tests but only ran 16. # Looks like your test died just after 16. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 17-44 Failed 28/44 tests, 36.36% okay -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #43302] [TODO] config/gen/makefiles.pm: Write unit tests

2008-07-28 Thread Andy Dougherty
truly a SPARC-specific issue. So another reasonable possibility is to just delete that whole section of code and make no sparc-specific changes to CFLAGS. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56928] [TODO]: Remove config step auto::pack

2008-07-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
x27;) || $intval; $conf->data->set( iv => $intval, More generally, I was just making my usual rant that prior to extensive refactoring or testing of any file, it makes sense to consider whether the existing behavior is even worth refactoring or testing. (Specifically, I'm thinking about the auto/pack.pm stuff. This opcode_t stuff is more subtle, but it came up recently in another context, so I thought I'd mention it.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 'make' concludes noisily on Darwin

2008-07-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
ails, but, parrot shouldn't assume that all linkers are similarly insensitive. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #46681] [TODO] [C] Use strerror_r instead of strerror

2008-07-18 Thread Andy Dougherty
specifically 0 if successful, and something else otherwise. (What that "something" else actually is seems to be defined differently by different vendors, alas. OpenBSD and Solaris return errno. Linux/glibc returns -1.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56928] Failing tests in t/steps/auto_pack-01.t

2008-07-18 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote: > > 3. Are there any other configuration steps which are no longer needed? > > Well, I proposed eliminating the attributes and warnings tests, but I was > overruled on that.

Re: [perl #34549] atan2() isn't IEEE compliant on OpenBSD/*BSD/Cygwin/Solaris

2008-07-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
s all these platforms, I think the ticket is resolved. If > not, maybe we need to break this into more-specific sub-tickets for each > failing platform. It still fails in the identical way on Solaris 8/SPARC with gcc. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56928] Failing tests in t/steps/auto_pack-01.t

2008-07-14 Thread Andy Dougherty
list [perl #56484] that brought up a closely-related issue. > 3. Are there any other configuration steps which are no longer needed? Well, I proposed eliminating the attributes and warnings tests, but I was overruled on that. Other than those, nothing occurs to me off the top of my head. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56304] AutoReply: smokej consumes all memory Revision: 28672 on linux

2008-07-14 Thread Andy Bach
.78 CPU) Result: FAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/cvs/andy/parrot> TEST_PROG_ARGS=" " prove -v t/stm/runtime.t t/stm/runtime.. 1..5 ok 1 - choice (one thread) ok 2 # SKIP Intermittently failing everywhere ok 3 # SKIP Intermittently failing everywhere ok 4 - queue adapted for the libr

Re: [perl #56810] [CAGE] pf_items assumes sizeof(INTVAL) == sizeof(opcode_t)

2008-07-11 Thread Andy Dougherty
L) != sizeof(void *). Thus while it's probably generally true that sizeof(opcode_t) == sizeof(INTVAL), it's not enforced at the Configure.pl level. In sort, it certinaly shouldn't be hard to include INTVALSIZE in the PackFile header, but you can also probably "temporari

Re: [perl #56716] speed up the configure tests

2008-07-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
be repeated. To give some sense of scale: On my aging-but-busy Solaris 8/SPARC system, the configure tests take about 15 minutes to run, and account for about 1/4 of the total run time for 'make test'. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #51652] [PATCH] Possible alignment issues with new STRING structures

2008-07-08 Thread Andy Dougherty
e error went away if you padded the string structure with an extra element, so it does indeed smell like an alignment assumption somewhere. My first guess was that calculations involving sizeof(Buffer) were now questionable, but that was just a guess. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #51652] [PATCH] Possible alignment issues with new STRING structures

2008-07-07 Thread Andy Dougherty
worry was more related to memory constructs that are not explicit structures, but that are managed "by hand" (e.g. the refcount in src/resources.c). -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

Re: [perl #56304] AutoReply: smokej consumes all memory Revision: 28672 on linux

2008-07-04 Thread Andy Armstrong
s under certain circumstances. Fixed in svn. I'm going to be making a new release sometime in the next couple of days. Might be worth hanging on to see if that fixes it? -- Andy Armstrong, Hexten

Re: [perl #56484] Re: The long long and The Short of It

2008-06-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
ery long time. Looking back at my (very incomplete) archives, the last success I had with this configuration was on Dec 19, 2002. There is a very old ticket [perl #18189] on this issue too. There are some remarks in there that might still be relevant. (Odd. That ticket seems to be marked resolved, though I thought by replying to it I would have reopened it.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RFC] merge stack_common.c and stacks.c

2008-06-29 Thread Andy Lester
vel source, that I can handle. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

[perl #56326] docs fail to build in make smoek - PERLDOC not defined in makefiles: Revision: 28692

2008-06-25 Thread Andy Bach
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56326] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56326 > Seeing, on linux and x86 Darwin/leopard for make smoke: ranlib: f

Re: [perl #56012] ccs make on solaris 8

2008-06-25 Thread Andy Dougherty
command line option. Again, I don't know why, and it seems backwards to me, but I'm reluctant to suggest changing it in case it was deliberate. More generally, the default MAKE setting ought not to be recursive. I really don't know why that variable is called MAKE instead of something like MAKE_C. Using MAKE_C would eliminate the recursive issue without the "ugly hack". -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #56304] AutoReply: smokej consumes all memory Revision: 28672 on linux

2008-06-24 Thread Andy Bach
free, 419196k buffers Swap: 1052216k total,88152k used, 964064k free, 213692k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME COMMAND 10155 andy 23 0 71956 58m 4044 S 99.8 2.9 0:37.46 parrot had to kill it ... - t/stm/llqueue.t - t/stm/queue.t - t/stm/runt

[perl #56304] smokej consumes all memory Revision: 28672 on linux

2008-06-24 Thread Andy Bach
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56304] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56304 > running smokej from cron, all seems to build find and smoke.html gets made/

[perl #56152] Darwin 10.5.3 x86 rel 28576 - test codingstd/perlcritic - assuming ProhibitAmbiguousNames::default_forbidden_names() in Perl::Critic 1.03

2008-06-20 Thread Andy Bach
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56152] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56152 > prove -v t/codingstd/perlcritic.t t/codingstd/perlcritic..Undefined sub

Re: [perl #56118] AutoReply: --jitcapable seg fault on Darwin x86 10.5.3 on Revision: 28564

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
Here's a simpler bt (from integer_42.pasm) #0 0x8fe18b42 in __dyld_misaligned_stack_error () #1 0x0004 in ?? () #2 0x005cbbe0 in real_exception (interp=0x112a00, ret_addr=0x0, exitcode=28, format=0x85143b "Divide by zero") at src/exceptions.c:903 #3 0x0104cc5f in ?? () #4 0x005dec4d in ru

Re: [perl #56118] AutoReply: --jitcapable seg fault on Darwin x86 10.5.3 on Revision: 28564

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
After some fiddling (thanks Bruce!!!) I was able to get a core dump - here's the backtrace: #0 0x005d4405 in gc_ms_alloc_objects (interp=0x1117c0, pool=0x111b10) at src/gc/smallobject.c:399 399 pool->objects_per_alloc = (size_t)(pool->objects_per_alloc * (gdb) bt #0 0x005d4405 in gc_

[perl #56118] --jitcapable seg fault on Darwin x86 10.5.3 on Revision: 28564

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56118] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56118 > Building w/ JIT a number of the smokej tests fail: 10911 OK from 11062 tes

Re: [perl #56030] AutoReply: Parrot buildfest YAPC::NA::2008 x86 Leopard, build revision 28515 - Configure msg on readline test

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
Never mind - an newly added application got in the path w/ an older version of something. Original msg in Config is the only issue.

[perl #56030] Parrot buildfest YAPC::NA::2008 x86 Leopard, build revision 28515 - Configure msg on readline test

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56030] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56030 > Parrot/perl6 build fine but: Chec

Re: [perl #56030] AutoReply: Parrot buildfest YAPC::NA::2008 x86 Leopard, build revision 28515 - Configure msg on readline test

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
tat 65280, 0xff00) No subtests run On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Andy Bach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Never mind - an newly added application got in the path w/ an older > version of something. Original msg in Config is the only issue. >

Re: [perl #56030] AutoReply: Parrot buildfest YAPC::NA::2008 x86 Leopard, build revision 28515 - Configure msg on readline test

2008-06-19 Thread Andy Bach
svn upped to 28515 and now attempting perl6 (all tests passed all spectest_regression tests passed on 28513) and: dyld: Symbol not found: __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart Referenced from: /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/ImageIO.framework/Versions/A/Image

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #44379] config/auto/attributes.pm ought to use its own test_c.in

2008-06-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008, chromatic via RT wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2007 10:11:20 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > This next patch does a little more cleanup on the attributes checking. I > > revised config/auto/attributes.pm to use the existing Configure routines > > cc_bu

Re: [perl #39742] [BUG] installed parrot conflicts with dev parrot.

2008-06-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
ussion can be found here (and the surrounding thread): http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/2006/03/msg33340.html -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #44039] [CAGE] in compact_pool, we can be doing null dereferences

2008-06-09 Thread Andy Lester
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:13 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote: Andy: Is this still the case? I don't know. I haven't done anything in parrot for months. Sorry. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: [perl #40059] [CAGE] Fix symbol table namespace pollution

2008-06-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
ine this? Could this be > converted into a coding standards test? On a Unix-like system, you can use nm(1) to look at blib/lib/libparrot.a. (The appropriate options are system-dependent, but 'nm -p' is usually a good bet.) -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #37819] [PATCH] Sun4 builds fail linking against jit.o

2008-06-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Steve Peters wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > > > >> If the patch is applied, is this ticket safe to close now? > > > > No. It&#

Re: [perl #37819] [PATCH] Sun4 builds fail linking against jit.o

2008-06-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > On Tue May 15 14:54:01 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 07:21:44 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > > [appending to an old ticket, since if anyone wants to ever get this > > > working again, th

Re: [perl #47395] [BUG] [PATCH] t/configure/115-auto-warnings.t assumes cc -Wall works.

2008-06-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > On Tue Jan 15 20:08:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Patches applied to trunk in r24898. > > Can we close this ticket if the patches are applied? Yes, this one can be closed. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #55196] 'print' and 'say' format a number register differently

2008-06-03 Thread Andy Bach
41596 ... ./parrot ../pi.pir 3.1416 3.141596 and for $N1 = 3.1415968 3.1416 3.141597 a -- Andy Bach Systems Mangler Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (608) 261-5738 Fax: 264-5932 Sent from Evolution (CentOS)!!!

Re: [perl #54992] [CAGE] Add a 'codetest' make target

2008-05-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
en useless for a couple of years now) Alas, I suspect it probably doesn't generally work. I seem to recall that t/harness doesn't pass through unrecognized arguments, so something sensible-looking like make test PARROT_ARGS='--runcore=gcdebug' won't actuall

Re: [perl #54920] [PATCH] Compiling pcc.c on Solaris10-x86

2008-05-29 Thread Andy Dougherty
do when presented with the code int *a, i; a = NULL; i = *a; The actual result you get will depend on the compiler, the optimization level, and the runtime environment. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [perl #54734] AutoReply: make perl6 failing on Revision: 27774 (Ubuntu 8.06)

2008-05-24 Thread Andy Bach
pl line 32. so: [EMAIL PROTECTED] perl6]$ ls -l src/pmc/mutable.pmc.template ls: src/pmc/mutable.pmc.template: No such file or directory but w/ an underscore before "pmc" the file is there: [EMAIL PROTECTED] perl6]$ ls -l src/pmc/mutable_pmc.template -rw-rw-r-- 1 andy andy 826

Re: [perl #53990] [CAGE] [PATCH] warnings in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c

2008-05-12 Thread Andy Lester
On May 12, 2008, at 3:11 AM, NotFound wrote: Maybe the solution is to avoid the problem, that is, put the declarations outside of the HEADERIZER block. What's the point of having static functions inside one? So that declaration and definition are always in sync. -- Andy Lester =>

Re: [svn:parrot] r27436 - in trunk: compilers/imcc include/parrot src/charset src/gc

2008-05-11 Thread Andy Lester
I accept that, and the note helps, but I just pulled the conditional declarations out of the block and ran make headerizer again. It put the headers for the conditional functions back in the headerizer block. Yeah, I understand. I don't have a solution yet. I'll ponder.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >