On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:55:26AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
>
> It's meant to be a simple fallback for languages that are too pathetic
> to implement their own regex compiler. ("FooLang should have regular
> expressions, but I'm too lazy! I'll just use rx_compile!") Currently
> I'm thinking of
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:27:27AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Steve Simmons writes:
> > . . . IMHO the RFC editor should be responsible for this.
>
> IMHO someone should write an RFC on why perl6 should NOT have
> comments. The RFC editor doesn't have time to fol
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:40:24AM +0900, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> > > That Perl should stay Perl
> > Do we need an RFC for this? Seems like this is more of a "guiding
> > concept" that should be intergrated into everything. Just my o
