-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; 'Josh Wilmes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [patch] fixes so it builds with lcc [APPLIED]
>
>
> At 02:24 PM 1/6/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> &g
Ok, trying to compile with lcc for wint32, I get...
Determining if your C compiler is actually gcc (this could take a
while):
cpp: Can't open input file msvcrt.lib
C compiler died! at Configure.pl line 748, line 9.
Also, why is this line in Configure.pl (748)
system("$c{cc} $c{ccflags} -I./in
Once the patch is applied, I can test on my own win32 lcc. I don't have
on on Linux, so I can't test at this time.
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Josh Wilmes
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
the pmc.t test 48 through 52 all fail. I've reported this two days ago
as well, seems like it hasn't been fixed yet.
nmake test also recompiles test_parrot.exe, so it's compiled once at
nmake and again at nmake test.
Ilya Sterin
The array_test #44 within pmc.t is segfaulting.
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:05 PM
> To: 'Melvin Smith'; 'Jason Diamond'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for
It compiled fine with #if 0, but now interp1.t hangs.
Ilya
P.S. I have to step away for a few, but I'll be back to test the rest
in an hour or so.
> -Original Message-
> From: Melvin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 6:46 PM
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Melvin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Jason Diamond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ParrotIO : Please test this [PATCH] for breakage
>
>
> At 03:33 PM 1/1/2002 -0800, Jason Diamond
Oooopss, sorry. Disregard this, since Melvin just submitted the actual
correct version:-)
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: io.c problem and patch
>
Small patch to return a value in io.c PIO_close().
323c323
< return 1; ---
> return;
io_os.c(127) : error C2065: 'F_GETFL' : undeclared identifier
With the latest CVS, after the ParrotIO patch.
Ilya
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)
>
>
> "Sterin, Ilya" wrote:
> > I wonder if it matters what current perl version you are
> using? Also
> > what VC++ and Servi
"might be" before going deeper.
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Color codes in tinderbox (All tests pass!!!)
>
>
> "
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: 'Dan Sugalski'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using stringified address
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
Re: Color codes in tinderbox
>
>
> "Sterin, Ilya" wrote:
> > I haven't done any testing yet, though.
>
> It compiles here, too. But 'nmake test' runs as far as
>
> t/op/basic..ok
> t/op/bitwiseok
> t/op/debuginfo..ok
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 9:59 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using stringified address
>
>
> At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> >Ok,
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ily
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ily
se of something I'm trying to accomplish:-)
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:18 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On
Ok, I understand that this hasn't been implemented due to the believe
that it's a dangerous feature (Programming Perl). But would it be ok to
enable/disable it with a specific pragma?
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
Not sure if this has already been discussed, but I though this would be
a cool option, especially since I've ran into a few cases where this
would have been very usefull.
Using a scalar (string) with an address to another variable and be able
to dereference it. This proves very usefull when pasi
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan C. Warnock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:10 PM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; 'Dan Sugalski'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Color codes in tinderbox
>
>
> On Monday 31 December 2001 11:58 pm
i [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Color codes in tinderbox
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
>
> > Just to let you know, the latest CVS compiled on Win32 VC++ 6.0
> > Enterprise SP
Just to let you know, the latest CVS compiled on Win32 VC++ 6.0
Enterprise SP 5. There are quite a few warning, though it's a big
progress from yesterday's problems. I haven't done any testing yet,
though.
Ilya
' : return code '0x2'
Stop.
Ilya Sterin
> -----Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:55 AM
> To: 'Dan Sugalski'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Win32 build problems
>
>
> Ohhh,
Ok, sorry guys. I see now it's generated by vtable_h.pl, but am I
supposed to run it or is Configure.pl supposed to do it, as I see it now
nothing does this.
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:59
..cvsignore file lists the vtable.h file???
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:33 PM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Win32 build problems
>
>
> At 11:27 PM 12/30/
Ohhh, just though about it, the user/pass is not registered in the cvs
server, and I don't need for now.
Though the anonymous should of worked, right?
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:33 PM
>
nday, December 30, 2001 8:33 PM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Win32 build problems
>
>
> At 11:27 PM 12/30/2001 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> >The package was downloaded from Simon's directory on CPAN.
>
> Could you try a CVS checkout? Things ha
Thanks, I'll try right now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:33 PM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Win32 build problems
>
>
> At 11:27 PM 12/30/2001 -0800, Steri
Trying to build 0.0.3.
perl Configure.pl runs fine.
>nmake
No warnings above.
cl -nologo -O1 -MD -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE -DNO_STRICT
-DHAVE_DES_FC
RYPT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLICIT_SYS -DPERL_MSVCRT_READFIX
-I./in
clude -Fochartypes/usascii.obj -c chartypes/usascii.
om: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:15 PM
> To: Dan Sugalski
> Cc: Sterin, Ilya; ''[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' '
> Subject: Re: String/Number differentiation
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:09:56PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
&g
he case at this time.
Again this happens rare enough where we don't have to break our heads over
the behavior and the implementation, just a simple explicit hack will do as
long as it's guaranteed to work:-)
Ilya
-Original Message-
From: Dan Sugalski
To: Sterin, Ilya; '[EM
I don't know if this has already been discussed, or is out of the question,
but I wonder since perl does not currently differentiate between numbers and
string, and when it does, it does so very inconsistantly, is there be any
hope for any changes/modificatins for Perl 6.
Many can argue that this
02:24 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> >Let's see. Illegible syntax in his opinion is mostly presented
> in regular
> >expression syntax. Is he a dumb @$$ or what.
>
> It would probably be best, all things considered, if we could
> refrain from
> criticizing ind
> -Original Message-
> From: raptor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 8:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Links
>
>
> All I found with lycos... but no speed comparison only mumbo-jumbo :
> http://language.perl.com/versus/
> http://www.jvoegele.com/sof
Actually there were some tests done, can't recall where now, though by a
trusted source. I will be digging it up in my email and emailing it to the
list. There were a few languages tested including Perl, C, C++, Java (can't
remember if Python was there). Perl came in in second place after C. Ye
37 matches
Mail list logo
