On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:14:58AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> It means I didn't do anything with it one way or the other. Since it
> pertains to a different test, it probably would have been better off in
> a separate RT.
>
> If someone else can look at it prior to tomorrow's release, th
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:28:26AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Sun Mar 16 19:28:53 2008, kraai wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > t/examples/pasm.t fails because examples/pasm/fact.pasm now outputs 30
> > factorials, whereas the test case only expects it to output 6.
>
>
> I was just at the po
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:29:04AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Mon Mar 10 23:12:23 2008, kraai wrote:
>
> >
> > The final test in t/perl/Parrot_Test.t still fails for me. It's a TODO
> > test, so it can't use test_fail. The attached patch should handle all
> > versions of Test::Build
On Sun Mar 09 19:32:32 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt Kraai's contributions appear to have resolved the problem.
> t/perl/Parrot_Test.t has been passing for me and for reliable
> smoke-testers for the past week. So I am resolving this ticket.
The final test in t/perl/Parrot_Test.t still fa
