Leo~
On 2/20/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *) the resizable variant is heavily borked WRT allocation size
> fixes welcome
>
> *) I don't think that *BooleanArray should support:
>
>set P0[0], 3.2
>set P0[1], "foo"
>set P0[2], P1
>
> nor
>
>set N0, P[0]
>.
Andy~
On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> > All~
> >
> > On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM
All~
On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> > > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch.
> >
> > Only if you'r
<http://xrl.us/jwuc>
Macros
Herbert Snorrason wants more specifics on macros in Perl 6. Larry gave
him some.
<http://xrl.us/jwud>
Synopsis Typos
Yiyi Hu and Andrew Savige found a few typos in a few synopses. Larry
graciously fixed them.
<http://
ML::Parser::Syck
Bernhard Schmalhofer posted a brief look at what has already been done
with adding support of libsyck and left the door open to anyone who
wished to pick up the torch. Warnock applies.
<http://xrl.us/jpxi>
Parrot Link Issues
Klaas-Jan Stol had problems l
Klaas-Jan~
On 1/20/06, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to index aggregates using several types of keys (that is,
> several types of values), and it seems only string and integer values
> can be used as keys. A quick look at the source in
> compilers/imcc/symreg.c confir
Bob~
On 1/15/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:28, Bob Rogers wrote:
>
> >I had thought this field was being used, but it turns out to be
> > irrelevant. I offer this patch so that no one else is fooled (and
> > because I had to test it anyway to prove
Perl 6 Summary for 2006-01-02 though 2006-01-09
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. On a complete tangent, if you are
playing World of Warcraft and see a troll hunter named Krynna, she
rocks. She royally saved me. Be nice to her.
Perl 6 Compiler
PIL Containers and Roles
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-12-05 through 2005-12-12
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary. This week, like last, Parrot has
produced the highest volume of emails. Fine by me, Parrot tends to be
easiest to summarize. This summary is brought to you by Snow (the latest
soft toy in t
Leo~
On 12/4/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2005, at 5:57, Matt Diephouse wrote:
>
> > Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >>
> add_sub($S0, $P0)
> >>>
> add_namespace($S0, $P0)
> >>>
> add_var($S0, $P0)
> >
Piers~
On 11/30/05, The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, I hopped into a taxi (and I use the word hopped advisedly) and
> repaired straightway to King's Cross and thence home to Gateshead, where
> my discomfort was somewhat ameliorated by the distraction of preparin
Chip~
On 11/29/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider:
>
>P0 = P1
>P0 = S1
>P0 = I1
>P0 = N1
>
> o/~ One of these things is not like the others
> One of these things just doesn't belong o/~
>
> And if I have to read:
>
>P0 = new .Integer
>P0 = 1
>
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-11-14 through 2005-11-21
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. The attentive among you may notice
that this one is on time. I am not sure how that happened, but we will
try and keep it up. On a complete side note, I think there should be a
Perl guild o
Will~
On 11/9/05, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Updated the "Where we are" section.
>From this section: "check out This week on Perl 6 by Matt Fowles,"
that should also say "and Piers Cawley".
Thanks for keeping the website pretty, it is our public face.
Matt
All~
On 11/6/05, Joshua Juran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2005, at 4:27 PM, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Nov 01 04:52:22 2005]:
> >>
> >> This patch fixes two classes of issue.
> >>
> >> * Don't assign -1 to an unsigned variable; use ~0U instead as it
>
Nick~
On 10/26/05, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guy,
>
> As a follow-up to a discussion a few days ago about binding parrot to
> C++ functions, is making it possible to compile parrot with a C++
> compiler a 'Bad Thing'?
I like the idea, but I tend to like C++ more than reason woul
=head1 Perl 6 Summary for 2005-10-10 through 2005-10-18
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. Sadly, this week's summary is not
brought to you by cookies as I already finished them. Sadder still,
it is also brought to you a week late. On the plus side, Mike
Doughty's "Haughty Melodic" is qui
Patrick~
On 10/10/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:45:54AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Perhaps a better approach would be to perform a bit
> > of static analysis on the grammar and look for left recursions at
> > creatio
Patrick~
On 10/10/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:02AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Patrick~
> >
> > The theoretical implementation of this is quite simple. Keep a
> > counter. everytime a token is consum
Patrick~
On 10/9/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:55:44AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > > > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
> > >
> > > My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
> > > most progra
Joshua~
On 10/9/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 03 12:49:55 2005]:
> >
> > I brought it up on the list first, and Dan was OK with it because
> > scons can output a series of commands (like a bat file or batch
> > script) to build from scratch (n
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-26 through 2005-10-02
All~
Welcome to another summary, this time a day late because I was in Philly
for Serenity. If you haven't seen Serenity yet you should stop reading
this summary and go see it. The summary will be here when you get back.
I promis
Joshua~
On 10/3/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 22 17:19:34 2004]:
> >
> > All~
> >
> > This patch is an early step in getting a scons based build system for
> > parrot. Currently, it leaves the make system in place, the goal being
> > to add a
Jonathan~
On 9/22/05, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Roger Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you do tweak the signature for the packfile format, I suggest you
> > take a leaf out of the PNG specification and ensure that the signature
> > will robustly detect common erro
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-12 through 2005-09-19
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary, this time brought to you with a
shorter pause (::grumble:: $WORK ::grumble::) and assisted by cookies.
Perl 6 Compilers
Circular Preludes for Fun and Confusion
Yuval Kogman posted a reall
Jonathan~
On 9/19/05, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nicholas Dronen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:48:08PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> > [ snip ]
> >
> >> I guess if I could offer any advice, it'd be don't be afraid of asking
> >> questions
Nick~
On 9/15/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:17PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Nick~
> >
> > Dan's plan was to do a topographic sort of the object tree to avoid
> > this problem for non-loops and to break loop
Nick~
Dan's plan was to do a topographic sort of the object tree to avoid
this problem for non-loops and to break loops randomly. I believe he
was even tempted to call rand in there just to make sure people didn't
come to depend on a behavior...
I think it might be wise for us to make all the de
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-15 through 2005-08-22
All~
Welcome to another monday summary, which hopefully provides some
evidence that mondays can get better. It always feels like writing
summaries is an uphill battle, perhaps I should switch to writing about
Perl 6 Language firs
Tim~
On 8/15/05, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone given any thought to Parrot <-> Java integration?
>
> Possible?
Definitely.
> Practical?
You would likely lose some speed, but that is really all.
> How much would would be involved?
Not a whole lot more than making a java compil
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-02 through 2005-08-10
All~
Welcome to another summary, brought to you by chinese food. The
attentive among you will notice that this summary is a day late, because
I did not feel like doing it yesterday. If only I could do that at
work...
Perl 6 Co
Leo~
On 8/10/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ /me warnock fighting - and update below for method calls ]
>
> Original Message
> Subject: call opcodes cleanup
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:52:07 +0200
> From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Perl 6 Intern
Will~
Doesn't make have something called "PHONY" to handle that exact case?
Matt
On 7/27/05, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is because there's a directory called "tcl". Since the directly
> already exists, there'd be nothing to make.
>
> Picking a dummy target like this is a way
ilures Nonfatal
Bernhard Schmalhofer suggested that " make languages " should not give
up after the first failure, but should instead build the remaining
languages.
<http://xrl.us/gv7k>
Dynclasses on Windows
Nick Glencross and Jonathan Worthington dis
mem_sys_memcopy(PMC_data(dest), PMC_data(SELF), NEEDED_SIZE(sd->size));
-PObj_active_destroy_SET(dest);
-return dest;
+PMC *copy = SUPER();
+/* copy trimmed extra space */
+PMC_int_val2(copy) = PMC_int_val(SELF);
+return copy;
}
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-07-05 through 2005-07-12
All~
Welcome to another summary from the frog house. A house so green it can
be seen from outerspace (according to google earth).
Perl 6 Compiler
Building Pugs Workaround
Sam Vilain posted a useful work around to the error "err
Will~
On 7/6/05, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be nice if the summarizers also summarized the various
> Planet RSS feeds of journal entries, if those entries were
> sufficiently relevant.
I would be willing to do that, but I can't speak for Piers...
Matt
--
"Computer Scie
All~
On 7/1/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Attempting to come up with a simplistic math grammar that has one possible
> > operand (A) and one possible operator (*) - so that things like A, A*A, and
> > A*A*A*A*A are all parsed. This simplistic example (thanks to spinclad on
> > #pe
Leo~
On 6/30/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice summary with examples:
>
> ftp://ftp.inf.puc-rio.br/pub/docs/techreports/04_15_moura.pdf
>
> and we still have to define semantics of parrot couroutines, e.g. WRT
> argument passing. See also Dan's blogs about couroutines,
I pre
Leo~
On 6/29/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> > Core was generated by `./parrot --gc-debug
> > /home/mfowles/perl6/parrot/t/pmc/io_1.pir'.
>
> Ah. ok. That's a TODO tests that is supposed to fail. It is testing i
Patrick~
On 6/29/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:11:24PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> >Parrot Loses with Fedora Core 4
> > Patrick reported that Fedora Core 4 and Parrot don't get along well. Leo
> > s
Jens~
On 6/29/05, Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > #13 0x0808588e in main (argc=1, argv=0xb8ac) at imcc/main.c:637
> Can you please run
> print ((char**)0xb8ac)[1]
> to find out which file causes the coredump??
Sure!
> gdb ./parrot core
Core was generated by `./parrot --gc-debu
ister Allocation Bug
Leo opened a ticket for a problem with improper control flow tracking.
Bill Coffman wondered whether the new register design had been
implemented yet.
<http://xrl.us/gke9>
Pass by Value PMCs
Klaas-Jan Stol mused that the new calling conventions
All~
Although all tests pass, a core file is created during the test run.
Here is a little snippet from GDB. I am running a fairly stock Debian
Testing x86 (slightly out of date).
(gdb) list
1006INTVAL
1007PIO_putps(theINTERP, PMC *pmc, STRING *s)
1008{
1009ParrotIOLayer *l
Chip~
On 6/12/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like like to note for other readers and the p6i archives that
> Piers has failed to grasp the problem, so the solution seems pointless
> to him. I'm sorry that's the case, but I've already explained enough.
This response worries
All~
On 6/3/05, Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are several threads in the parrot mailing list that discuss the
> continuations problem. I hoped to be able to address parrot register
> allocator again, at some point, but it could be a while before I get to
> that. In the mean tim
All~
On 6/3/05, Curtis Rawls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/3/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dheeraj Kumar Arora wrote:
> > >I m interseted in one of LLVM project
> > > "Implement well-known optimizations in PIR compiler (SSA ->
> > > register
> > > allocat
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-05-24 through 2005-05-31
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary, brought to you by Aliya's new
friends, Masha Nannifer and Philippe, and my own secret running joke.
Without further ado, I bring you Perl 6 Compiler.
Perl 6 Compiler
method chaining
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-05-03 through 2005-05-17
All~
Welcome ot another fortnight's summary. Wouldn't it just figure that I
can't think of anything sufficiently non-sequiterish to amuse myself.
Perhaps I need a running gag like Leon Brocard or chromatic's
cummingseque capitali
Bob~
On 5/3/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>. . . but I can't figure out why. I thought the patch below would
> help, but it appears that the value of c is itself broken somehow.
>
> . . .
> This GDB was configured as "i586-suse-linux"...
> (gdb) r runtime/parrot/libra
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-04-26 through 2005-05-03
All~
Welcome to another weeks summary. This week I shall endeavor not to
accidentally delete my summary or destroy the world. So here we go with
p6c.
Perl 6 Compilers
implicit $_ on for loops
Kiran Kumar found a bug in pugs
All~
I am near boston so worst case senario I can take it. But I would
prefer not to if another option is there.
Matt
On 4/25/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:37:07 +0100
>
>On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:46:
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-04-12 through 2005-04-19
All~
Sadly, a slip of the mouse cause me to delete a partially completed
summary, so I am going to push ahead on the rewrite without a witty
intro. Feel free to make one up for yourself involving stuffed animals,
musicians, and d
Perl 6 Language
ceil and floor
Ingo Blechschmidt wondered if ceil and floor would be in the core.
Warnock applies... Although Unicode operators would let me define
circumfix \lfloor \rfloor (although I only know how to make those
symbols in tex...). Hmmm... using tex to right P
All~
On Apr 2, 2005 3:53 PM, William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know, no one is working on these at the moment.
>
> Volunteers welcome, of course. ^_^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hi,all
> > have a Php compiler to parrot project?
> > have a ruby compiler to parrot projec
Leo~
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:22:29 +0200, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 5) infix method signature change:
>
> >METHOD PMC* add( [INTERP, SELF,] PMC* rhs, PMC ´*dest) {
> > if (!dest)
> > dest = pmc_new(INTERP, SELF-
Leo~
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:37:41 +0200, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5) infix method signature change:
>
>METHOD PMC* add( [INTERP, SELF,] PMC* rhs, PMC ´*dest) {
> if (!dest)
> dest = pmc_new(INTERP, SELF->vtable->base_type);
> ...
> return dest;
>
All~
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:19:09 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [mdiep - Di 22. Mär 2005, 14:35:02]:
> >>
> >> pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS.
> >> Either pmc2c.pl should be delete
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnights summary. I believe this is the highest
volume I have ever seen the three lists at simultaneously. Hopefully
they will keep it up, because good work is being done. To aid in the
epic endeavou
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-02-22 though 2005-03-07
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnight summary. Once again brought to you by
chocolate chips. This does have the distinction of being the first
summary written on a mac. So if I break into random swear words, just
bear with me.
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-02-08 through 2005-02-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnight summary. Lately p6l has been out
stripping p6i in volume. While this used to be the norm, lately it has
become a rare occurrence. Strange... Anyway, this summary would be
brought to you buy c
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-01-31 through 2004-02-8
All~
Welcome to yet another summary in which I will undoubtedly confuse to
homophones. Probably more than a few this week as I am a little tired.
But perhaps the alien on my window or the vampire on my monitor will
help straighten
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-01-18 through 2005-01-31
All~
Welcome to another double feature summary. Sadly, this one was delayed
because of an argument that I was/am having with my connection.
Fortunately, a generous neighbor has allowed me to use his connection
for the time being.
All~
I have been struggling with my internet for the past 4 days, so this
weeks summary will be part of a "double feature" fortnight's summary
next week. Figured that I would provide advanced notice though...
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-01-11 through 2005-01-18
Welcome to yet another Perl Summary brought to you by music and pizza
(although the pizza is late in arriving). Like many summaries before it,
we start with an attempt at non sequitur and Perl 6 Language.
Perl 6 Language
idiomatic P
Leo~
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:52:52 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ... If we add to it support. MMD, however, is where things begin
> > to differ. Instead of havng the find_method with the ext
All~
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:18:52 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> >> Below inline attached is a proposal for vtable changes, mainly WRT
> >> method lookup.
>
> > First, a general question: under what circumsta
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-01-03 through 2004-01-11
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary. In this summary, we will explore such
thrilling issues as multi-dimensional slices of Chinese food. After all,
the amount of sauce any piece of Chinese food can absorb is proportional
to its surface
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
All~
Welcome to a New Year of Perl 6 Summaries. I have been doing bi-weekly
summaries over the holiday season, but I plan on returning to weekly
ones now. Hopefully "World of Warcraft" won't prevent me, we shall see,
but if anyon
Simon~
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:44:04 -0500 (EST), Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does Parrot make any guarantee about the value of an uninitialzed array
> element, or should I expect the value returned by:
>
> new P0, .FixedBooleanArray
> set P0, 1
> set I0, P0[0]
>
> to be
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-06 through 2004-12-20
All~
The observant among you might notice that I missed last week's summary.
With the hubbub and confusion of the holidays, I blame ninjas, in
particular Ryu Hyabusa. Given that Christmas is next weekend and New
Years is the week
Will~
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:19:07 -0500, William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a plan at any point to move to an svn repository from cvs?
>
> I'd like to work on a patch to move all the perl* pmcs into dynclasses, which
> would involve quite a bit of file moving, and I'll happil
Leo~
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:29:00 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So my conclusion that (in combination with restoring registers to the
> values of continuation creation) I,S,N registers are almost unusable is
> correct?
I would disagree. Let me take the above example and wor
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >internal exception clean up
> > James deBoer submitted a patch that cleans up internal exception output.
> > Then later he submitted a second better version of the patch. Warnock
> &g
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-11-29 through 2004-12-06
All~
Last week I asked for help identifying the source of a quotation. One
friendly soul suggested Alan J. Perlis, but could not find an actual
attribution. It did lead me to find a very applicable (and in my mind
funny) quote fr
Leo~
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:26:24 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I'll try to summarize, where I see the problem. No diagrams, just
> code :)
>
> [snip]
Thanks for the clear explanation. I did not realize that S registers
could switch pointers, that does make things a lit
Leo~
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:26:24 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I'll try to summarize, where I see the problem. No diagrams, just
> code :)
>
> [snip]
Thanks for the clear explanation. I did not realize that S registers
could switch pointers, that does make things a li
All~
I must admit I am a little confused as to what the problem is. Given
that any continuation which was originally created as a return
continuation will restore its registers, all code which uses P/S
registers will work as expected. Furthermore, I/N registers will be
usable accross function ca
Michael~
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:44:37 -0500, Michael Walter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:33:27 -0500, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Strong typing can be more clearly seen in something like haskell where
> > you can def
Bill~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:12:30 -0800, Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:45:39 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > At 11:20 AM -0800 11/30/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
> > >% cat continuation6.ruby
> > >def strange
> > > callcc {|continuation|
Cameron~
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:53:32 +1000, Cameron Zemek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FAQ mentions that the JVM and CLR (.Net VM) are not suited to
> dynamic languages. I was wondering why this is the case.
>
> Also could the Parrot VM be used effectively with strong typing
> languages. I
Jeff~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:20:50 -0800, Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2004, at 10:27 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>
>
> > At 10:15 AM -0800 11/30/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
>
> > Oh. No, it won't. We've declared that return continuations will always
> > leave the top half regi
Jeff~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:15:00 -0800, Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2004, at 5:28 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > At 1:45 AM -0800 11/29/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2004, at 2:48 AM, Piers Cawley wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just thought of a heuristic that mig
Leo~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:30:43 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 9:15 PM +0100 11/23/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >>Below inline/attached are some thoughts WRT the subject.
> >>
> >>leo
> >>
> >>
> >>Lexicals, continuations
Dan~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:22:29 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:15 PM +0100 11/23/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>
> >Below inline/attached are some thoughts WRT the subject.
> >
> >leo
> >
> >
> >Lexicals, continuations, and register allocation
> >
> >1) Recent discussion
Dan~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:49:54 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:36 AM -0500 11/30/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
>
>
> >Dan~
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:28:35 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Dan~
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:28:35 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:45 AM -0800 11/29/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
>
>
> >On Nov 28, 2004, at 2:48 AM, Piers Cawley wrote:
> >
> >>I just thought of a heuristic that might help with register
> >>preservation:
> >>
> >>A variable/regi
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-11-22 through 2004-11-29
All~
Rather than try to do something witty about the strange music I am
listening to, or the stuffed animals who are assisting me. I will start
this summary off with an entirely self-serving request. A while
ago I saw the quote "
All~
I get segfaults (mentioned previously) on signal_1.pasm and signal_2.pasm
Despite these, make test reports success.
For the interested:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/parrot$ uname -a
Linux fowles 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 11 13:18:29 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Fairly stock debian system (usually pretty fo
All~
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:51:43 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to me that there is no good solution to this problem without
> > annotating the register set or killing the register allocator.
>
> I think I've proposed a re
Leo~
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:25:05 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leo~
>
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:42:31 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> And as
Leo~
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:42:31 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as a side effect it will make Dan's evils subs compile, because
> long-lived lexicals already have their storage aka register. Only temps
> need a register allocated.
What happens to temps that need to cross
Leo~
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:55:24 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Won't your approach put every one of those things in its own register?
>
> I've clearly stated that lexicals aka non-volati
Leo~
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:26:39 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> > Have we seen that this actually destroys us? Meaning, if we add the
> > extra CFG arcs, do we start spilling like mad? If not, this is much
> > ado ab
Leo~
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:15:33 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below inline/attached are some thoughts WRT the subject.
>
> leo
>
>
> Lexicals, continuations, and register allocation
>
> 1) Recent discussions have shown that we obviously can't handle all
> the side effec
Dan~
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:43:57 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:15 AM -0500 11/23/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
> >All~
> >
> >Aperiodically I notice that my parrot directory has quite a few core
> >files in it (usually around 6), even thou
All~
Aperiodically I notice that my parrot directory has quite a few core
files in it (usually around 6), even though I have done nothing with
it except "cvs -q update -dP; [make realclean;perl Configure.pl;]
make; make [full]test". Usually it says that all of the tests pass or
one or two tests f
Bill~
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:49:59 -0800, Bill Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >sub1() <---+ <-+
> >... ||
> >sub2() +<-+ |
> >...| |
> >sub3() ---+-+
>
> In the continuations enhanced control fl
Leo~
Thanks for the clarification.
Matt
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:48:58 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ... Thus you can consider all of the
> > following questions (even though they will be ph
Dan~
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:24:06 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could, but it would be wrong. Hell, it's arguably wrong for return
> continuations to do so, and it wouldn't be unreasonable to argue that
> I and N register contents are guaranteed crud and required refetching.
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
