[perl #56048] [OK]: Report on Parrot/Rakudo Build Fest at YAPC

2008-06-19 Thread Deven T. Corzine
# New Ticket Created by "Deven T. Corzine" # Please include the string: [perl #56048] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56048 > I checked Parrot out of Subversion on my Windows laptop with Torto

Re: Threads... last call

2004-01-23 Thread Deven T. Corzine
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 5:24 PM -0500 1/22/04, Deven T. Corzine wrote: Damian's issues were addressed before he brought them up, though not in one spot. A single global lock, like python and ruby use, kill any hope of SMP-ability. Hand-rolled threading has unpleasant complexity issues,

Re: Threads... last call

2004-01-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
Dan Sugalski wrote: Last chance to get in comments on the first half of the proposal. If it looks adequate, I'll put together the technical details (functions, protocols, structures, and whatnot) and send that off for abuse^Wdiscussion. After that we'll finalize it, PDD the thing, and get the

Possible regex engine optimizations?

2002-08-28 Thread Deven T. Corzine
Re: [perl6-language] Does ::: constrain the pattern engine implementation? On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > A medium-term goal for the regex engine is to note where a DFA would give > correct behaviour and use one, rather than going through the more > expensive generalized regex engi

Re: Autovivification behavior

2001-01-21 Thread Deven T. Corzine
Yeah, you're thinking along the same lines as I was. Unfortunately, there needs to be consensus about whether this behavior should be changed before it can be implemented -- any idea how to make that come about? Deven On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, David L. Nicol wrote: > "Deven T. C

Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:56:06PM -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > > Except for obvious performance-critical bottleneck areas, what advantages > > are there to implementing anything else first in C? > > One reason (maybe not a

Re: Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:43 PM 12/22/00 -0500, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > >I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I'm just tossing this > >idea on the table for discussion and consideration. (If this was already > >dis

Perl 6 compiling Perl 6?

2000-12-22 Thread Deven T. Corzine
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I'm just tossing this idea on the table for discussion and consideration. (If this was already discussed, please tell me what the conclusion was, if any.) How about implementing the Perl 6 compiler in Perl 6 itself? Note that I'm _not_ talking