[perl #39760] [CAGE] make warnings (r13197 - x86-msvc-7.1)

On Dom. 19 Oct. 2008 13:47:11, kjs wrote: > I think the issue of inconsistent dll linkage has been resolved recently > by adding the YYMALLOC and YYFREE #defines to imcc source. > > Can other windows people confirm this? Then this ticket can be closed. > Thank you very much, Confirmed. Parrot r

[PATCH] Add subclass tests on t/pmc/integer.t and RT #52198

Ok, picked up the committers challenge... :-) I setup a working Win32/MSVC environment for parrot, and I'm trying to address the Win32 related tickets. I started with RT #52198, test failures on Win32. There are still many .t files with failures. The first one I started to look into is t/pmc/com

Re: [perl #50956] Problems building in VS2008 with latest SVN tip

Steve Peters wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 3:45 AM, via RT Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # New Ticket Created by "Ted Neward" # Please include the string: [perl #50956] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50956 >

Re: [perl #49714] [PATCH] Extend perl6 spectest to fetch and execute S04-S29 tests

Jerry Gay via RT wrote: applied as r24965. it's causing a heck of a lot of failing tests. however, i'll leave them in for a day or three, while we see what we can do to get them passing. hint: getting 'fudge' working on rakudo would do us a world of good. ~jerry Do you mean running: perl6

Re: [perl #49714] [PATCH] Extend perl6 spectest to fetch and execute S04-S29 tests

Patrick wrote: I've been hoping to avoid subdirs in the SXX directories. In other words, instead of having S29-functions/type1/*.t S29-functions/type2/*.t S29-functions/type3/*.t I'd like to see S29-type1/*.t S29-type2/*.t S29-type3/*.t The idea is to have one directory under spe

Re: Playing with substr()

jerry gay ha scritto: On Jan 9, 2008 12:08 AM, Cosimo wrote: I'm trying to play with perl6.exe. I've wandered in the opened tickets for perl6 and saw this one about `substr()': http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=44321 what we ultimately want is tests that cover the spec, which

Re: Playing with substr()

jerry gay wrote: On Jan 9, 2008 12:08 AM, Cosimo wrote: So question is: would be useful to "port" the substr() test script from Perl5's `t/op/substr.t' also to Perl6? what we ultimately want is tests that cover the spec, which for 'substr' is probably very close to the perl 5 spec. however, m

Playing with substr()

I'm trying to play with perl6.exe. I've wandered in the opened tickets for perl6 and saw this one about `substr()': http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=44321 It ends with a patch that enables the 3rd optional argument for substr(). I gave it a shot, and it seems to work. So questi

Re: Repeated Loopy Variable Width String Character Access is Slooooow-ish

Cosimo wrote: Patrick wrote: [...] I also improved utf8_set_position What happens if string already has `i->charpos > pos' ? [... /me reads again the diff ...] I realized while writing this that if `i->charpos > pos'. you simply end up re-scanning the string from the start. Is that correct

Re: Repeated Loopy Variable Width String Character Access is Slooooow-ish

Patrick wrote: [...] I also improved utf8_set_position a bit so that it doesn't always have to restart position counting from the beginning of the string. As a result, compiling the actions.pl script on my machine goes from 39s to a little over 28s -- about a 25% speed increase. I have a doub

[perl #49238] [PATCH] pbc_to_exe compile failure on Win32 / MSVC9

On Mer. 02 Gen. 2008 05:40:32, cosimo wrote: > On Lun. 31 Dic. 2007 01:09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:05:38 Cosimo Streppone wrote: > > > > > I tried to follow chromatic's instructions to obtain a perl6 binar

[perl #49238] [PATCH] pbc_to_exe compile failure on Win32 / MSVC9

On Lun. 31 Dic. 2007 01:09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:05:38 Cosimo Streppone wrote: > > > I tried to follow chromatic's instructions to obtain a perl6 binary > > but had some problems [...] > > > 3) In the final generated "

[perl #49238] [PATCH] pbc_to_exe compile failure on Win32 / MSVC9

# New Ticket Created by "Cosimo Streppone" # Please include the string: [perl #49238] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49238 > I tried to follow chromatic's instructions to obtain a perl6 b

Re: [perl #47127] [PATCH] t/configure/111-auto_gcc-01.t test failure

James Keenan via RT wrote: > Cosimo, > > The more I look at this, the more I wonder whether the test failure in > 111-auto_gcc-01.t (reported below) has anything to do with the presence > or absence of gdbm on one's OS or whether one's Perl was build with gdbm > or not. > I'm sorry. I now realiz

Re: [perl #47127] [PATCH] t/configure/111-auto_gcc-01.t test failure

James Keenan via RT wrote: > Cosimo Streppone wrote: >> # New Ticket Created by Cosimo Streppone >> # Please include the string: [perl #47127] >> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. >> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=4