Re: [perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2009-04-18 Thread NotFound
>> It's great to have INTVAL and UINTVAL, but without MAX_INTVAL it's kind of >> hard to work with them in some respects.  All integral typedefs should > have >> min/max macros.  Syntax not a big deal, it can be fixed later, just don't >> break anything when introducing them. > > Nothing has happen

Re: [perl #39855] [CAGE] configuration: define MIN/MAX macros for all integral typedefs

2009-04-18 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:09:10AM -0700, Christoph Otto via RT wrote: > On Wed Aug 06 20:07:05 2008, Whiteknight wrote: > > On Sat May 17 14:57:18 2008, pmichaud wrote: > > > On Mon Jul 17 11:59:47 2006, chip wrote: > > > > It's great to have INTVAL and UINTVAL, but without MAX_INTVAL it's > > kin

Re: [perl #44499] [TODO] Move cstrings to String Structure

2009-04-18 Thread NotFound
> I tried to apply this patch to svn head, but it's different enough that > much of it will need to be rewritten.  If this is something worth > pursuing, I'm willing to reimplement and apply the patch (if NotFound > isn't interested).  If not, this ticket should be rejected. Reject it. I'll take a