Re: [perl #60940] Test failure: t/dynpmc/foo.t

2009-01-31 Thread kjstol
it's been failing for a while (until quite recently, iirc), but now it seems ok.Just svn up'ed, and nmake'd test; no failures. I'll report any new failures to trac, if necessary. thanks for coming back to me. Ticket can be closed. kjs On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:11 AM, James Keenan via RT < parrot

Re: [perl #59968] [BUG] Calling Test::More sub after catching a div by zero exception segfaults

2009-01-31 Thread Will Coleda
You can't use "P0" as a register in PIR these days, you need "$P0" instead. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:22 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote: > Reviewing this RT today, I get a completely different problem: > > $ cat seg.pir > .sub main :main > .include 'include/test_more.pir' > > new P0, 'Integer' > n

Re: [perl #59790] t/stm/basic_mt.t #4 hangs on several platforms

2009-01-31 Thread jerry gay
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 16:06, James Keenan via RT wrote: > The t/stm/*.t tests have gone away (when or whence I do not know), so I > propose we close this ticket. Any objections? > the STM subsystem has been removed. close the ticket, and all other STM-related tickets. ~jerry

Re: [perl #62920] Configure.pl errors generating makefile

2009-01-31 Thread ajr
> Could you try the following patch ? > That seems to have done the trick. -- Email and shopping with the feelgood factor! 55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com