On Saturday 29 November 2008 20:09:50 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Failure observed in r33324. So that narrows range to 33321-33324,
> inclusive.
If you're continuing to bisect to the offending patch, you don't need to
update the ticket with ranges is useful. If you can't narrow it down furthe
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #60926]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60926 >
This test has recently begun to fail on Darwin/PPC. (It continues to
pass for me on L
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 02 22:50:45 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This is a good, bite-sized task for Whiteknight.
>
> I wonder whether doing macro-magic for this improves readability of the
> code; it's hard as it is withou
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we keep the syntax:
>
> .param int "answer" => a
>
> ?
>
> I propose to remove it; it's not been documented, and it doesn't add
> particularly to readability IMHO (the argument-side using arrows, OTOH,
> is u
On Saturday 29 November 2008 15:25:52 Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
> I think this issue was related to the old MMD system. If so, then I
> suspect this ticket can be closed.
The example given was, but the underlying idea isn't.
> Please have a look at this issue, and close it/let know whether it
reject, there is a new ticket
Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
On Fri Dec 21 07:31:46 2007, pmichaud wrote:
Kevin Tew started investigating this ticket, and he discovered
that :method subs are already being placed as entries in the
namespace by default, which is the behavior I was looking for.
Author: kjs
Date: Sat Nov 29 10:21:48 2008
New Revision: 33348
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] clean up deprecations.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
