[perl #59336] [BUG] Parrot fails integer comparisons when integers are > 2^31 apart

2008-09-27 Thread Christoph Otto via RT
On Thu Sep 25 14:18:40 2008, julianalbo wrote: > > I suspect the problem is that the integer "greater than" operation > > is performing a subtraction between the two (signed long) values > > being compared, but the result of the subtraction is outside of > > the range of signed longs. > > Correct.

[perl #59410] [PATCH] CONTROL_LOOP_NEXT support for pct. Rakudo won't build, though.

2008-09-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stephen Weeks # Please include the string: [perl #59410] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59410 > This patch adds support for handling CONTROL_LOOP_NEXT exceptions in pct-generated for

Re: Revisiting lexicals, part 1

2008-09-27 Thread François Perrad
2008/9/24 Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:09:37PM +0200, François Perrad wrote: >> Currently, the bigger issue in Lua on Parrot is lexical or upvalue in >> Lua jargon (the reason for Lua on Parrot is not really Lua). >> The following Lua code doesn't give the ex