Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57468]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57468 >
There's an ifdef in misc.c to allow us to conditionally use
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:31:44AM -0700, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> > Committed a fix to tcl in branch (r29940) to pull from the correct
> > slot. All tests now pass. I'd like to see this segfault/assert/boom
> > addressed before we merge back, just in case.
>
> Resolved in r29941, by throwin
On Sat Aug 02 20:08:36 2008, tetragon wrote:
> The Configure test for MMX on Intel chips
Was this a test in t/configure/? t/steps/? or during Configure.pl itself?
> Committed a fix to tcl in branch (r29940) to pull from the correct
> slot. All tests now pass. I'd like to see this segfault/assert/boom
> addressed before we merge back, just in case.
Resolved in r29941, by throwing an exception when requesting an
attribute that doesn't exist, or an attribute a
# New Ticket Created by Robert G. Jakabosky
# Please include the string: [perl #57568]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57568 >
I have separated the bugfixes into different patch files and included one
large
2008/8/3 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I just merged in the pdd25cx branch. Resolving all the conflicts took
> several hours (124 files, 1 minute or more per file...), but otherwise it
> went smoothly.
>
> The biggest changes you'll notice are the new exception system, a vastly
> reduced us
Merged pdd25cx branch into trunk in r29952. Deleted branch in r29953.
Thanks.
Applied in r29937.
Francois.
2008/8/1 Robert G. Jakabosky (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> # New Ticket Created by Robert G. Jakabosky
> # Please include the string: [perl #57504]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Disp
2008/8/2 Allison Randal via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue Jul 22 06:10:41 2008, fperrad wrote:
> >
> > In fact 'docall' uses a pushaction.
>
> I modified 'docall' so it no longer uses pushaction, and all Lua tests
> are now passing.
>
>
Ok, tests pass, but the behavior has changed.
(The tests we
# New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
# Please include the string: [perl #57538]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57538 >
The Configure test for MMX on Intel chips segfaults when built as a
64-bit binary
On Tue Jul 29 07:46:08 2008, coke wrote:
>
> Make this ticket one of the children ticket of the META pdd25cx merge
> ticket, we can close it out after the merge removes it.
>
Allison++'s merge removed shift_pmc from src/pmc/exception.pmc, so this
ticket is now rejected.
# New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
# Please include the string: [perl #57536]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57536 >
Using a lightly modified config (RT#57532), I got parrot to build as a
64-bit Int
# New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
# Please include the string: [perl #57532]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57532 >
When attempting a 64-bit Intel build on OS X 10.5, the build fails
when the assem
From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:06:27 -0700
I just merged in the pdd25cx branch . . .
The biggest changes you'll notice are the new exception system, a vastly
reduced usage of the remaining stack (though it's not completely removed
yet), and
From: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:18:34 +0200
Will Coleda (via RT) schrieb:
> The parrot_debugger version should, IMO, be identical to the parrot
> version. (e.g., it's currently reporting as 0.4 instead of 0.6.x.)
Attached patch does that.
The pat
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
On Tue May 06 17:15:39 2008, coke wrote:
If the patch is applied, can we close this ticket?
No. I only figured out how to keep track of files generated during
configuration, not during build. We need some of what, IIRC, particle
termed "makefile trickery" to keep
Applied to trunk in r29967. s1n++. Rakudo testers: Please put this
through its paces over the next few days so we can flush out any bugs.
Thank you very much.
kid51
First patch was wrong, this is ok. (conf arg was missing)
--
Reini Urban
Index: parrot-svn/lib/Parrot/Configure/Compiler.pm
===
--- parrot-svn.orig/lib/Parrot/Configure/Compiler.pm
+++ parrot-svn/lib/Parrot/Configure/Compiler.pm
@@ -1
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #57548]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57548 >
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc= gcc
Will Coleda (via RT) schrieb:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57476]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57476 >
The parrot_debugger version should, IMO, be identical to
Reini Urban schrieb:
Andy Dougherty schrieb:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Can we get an update as to the issues raised in this ticket?
The general issue
"installeld parrot conflicts with dev parrot" -- at least
when a shared libparrot.so is used
is, as far as I
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #57546]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57546 >
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc= gcc
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:02:56PM -0700, Mark Glines wrote:
> Looking at Storable.xs in the various perl revs, it looks like 5.8.4 is the
> earliest version of perl which won't have this issue. If that isn't an
> acceptable requirement for parrot, I can try to figure out how to make the
> pmc
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
On Sat Aug 02 05:06:31 2008, rurban wrote:
On Sat Jun 14 17:17:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone on FreeBSD give us an update on this issue?
freebsd7, recent parrot svn (r29922)
passes the t/op/trans.t tests
Thanks for looking into this, Reini. Now, w
24 matches
Mail list logo
