On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy: Are you still getting the error reported in this ticket? If so,
> could you paste output of Configure.pl?
okay - attached - here's stderr
...
Updated to revision 29896.
Macintosh-3:/usr/share/cvs/afbach/parrot
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:25 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:01:12 2008, particle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> the failing test:
>> t/steps/auto_ctags-01ok 1/31
>> # Failed test 'Got expected result'
>> # at t/steps/auto_ctags-01.t line 65.
>>
On Wed Jul 30 16:26:13 2008, coke wrote:
> >
>
> Click "Goto first failure". Click "Failed". Click the box of the same
> color as the failed box: You should see the tap output:
>
Thanks, Coke. That enabled me to verify that for these 3 test files:
t/op/arithmetics.t
t/pmc/complex.t
t/pmc/fl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
> on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
>
> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
>
> But, AFAICT, the Smolder server do
On Tue Jul 29 11:01:12 2008, particle wrote:
>
>
> the failing test:
> t/steps/auto_ctags-01ok 1/31
> # Failed test 'Got expected result'
> # at t/steps/auto_ctags-01.t line 65.
> t/steps/auto_ctags-01NOK 17/31# got:
> 'yes'
> # ex
Interestingly enough, we are also getting failures on these 4 test files
on the OpenBSD Smolder tester:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/3135
But, AFAICT, the Smolder server doesn't identify the particular tests
within the file which are failing.
kid51
Would it be possible to get an update from Win32 users on these tests?
Specifically, output of 'prove -v' for these tests:
t/op/arithmetics.t
t/pmc/complex.t
t/pmc/float.t
(I'm going to assume that the sprintf test is still problematic.)
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Thu Jun 19 16:34:54 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeff (Todd, and anyone else getting the auto::readline error):
>
> Can you try out this patch:
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Attachment/389086/176448/darwin-
> editline-failer.txt
>
Jeff, Todd, et. al.:
Have you tried out this patch?
Andy: Are you still getting the error reported in this ticket? If so,
could you paste output of Configure.pl?
Thanks.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Tests contributed as part of r29867. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
On Wed Jul 30 12:24:35 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks, applied as r29881.
>
> -- c
>
Wow, first time in a year that anyone besides me has worked on these
tests :-)
Thanks, guys. Marking ticket resolved.
kid51
Author: coke
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:07:07 2008
New Revision: 29886
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[docs] add another RT for a newly deprecated item
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--- trunk/doc
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57438]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57438 >
>From PDD19:
=item .pragma n_operators [deprecated]
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Peter Gibbs wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > To properly support $tcl_precision in tcl, I need to change how I'm
> > currently implementing {$tcl_precision == 0}. Right now, I just fake
> A few points to ponder.
> 1) The def
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 12:10:32 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Yes, but we might as well clean up the other two cases as well. So this
> goes on top of yours:
>
> --- parrot-svn/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t 2008-07-30 15:05:43.0 -0400
> +++ parrot-x86/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t 2008-07-30 15:06:34.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:13 AM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
> # Please include the string: [perl #57410]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57410 >
Author: coke
Date: Wed Jul 30 12:17:08 2008
New Revision: 29880
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[docs]
- fix spelling mistake
- add RTs for several unimplemented features
- add RTs for several newly deprecated features
- Avoid deprecated features in code examples
- use more q{'};
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #57410]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57410 >
hi,
afaics, pdd19 does not specify the syntactic sugar for named arguments. So,
the f
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:20:33 Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > Ahh -- it's just an octal/decimal mix-up. Here's the patch:
> >
> > --- parrot-current/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t2008-07-30 13:45:19.0
> > -0400 +++ parrot-andy/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t 200
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57436]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57436 >
>From PDD 19:
{{ Wouldn't it be more useful to make this flexible, or at least only the
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:20:33 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Ahh -- it's just an octal/decimal mix-up. Here's the patch:
>
> --- parrot-current/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t 2008-07-30 13:45:19.0
> -0400 +++ parrot-andy/t/steps/auto_icu-01.t 2008-07-30 14:15:44.0
> -0400 @@ -228,7 +2
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57432]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57432 >
Using a , with HLL_map is now deprecated. Need to add the new syntax
first before this ca
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57430]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57430 >
=item .HLL_map =
This is identical to the current implementation that uses a , for its
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57428]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57428 >
While deprecated, there's currently no other way to achieve this
functionality. See RT #5
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57426]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57426 >
PDD19 defines a currently unimplemented PIR directive:
=item .HLL
Define the HLL for t
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:08:30 2008, doughera wrote:
> > After running the Configure.pl test suite, I'm seeing some
> > annoying-to-remove directories staying behind in /tmp.
> >
> > $ ls -lR /tmp/qdEG6yqmCn/
> > qdEG6yqmCn/:
> > total 16
> > drwxr-xr-x
Parrot via RT schrieb:
A useful optimization would be to remove the run-time access to
include/config.pir for linked installable's, where the frozen
config.fpmc is already linked.
There the sub _config should use some config detection logic
(suggestion: new config key 'installed') to omit
.i
Reini Urban schrieb:
Geoffrey Broadwell via RT schrieb:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 13:13 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
+stat $I0, conf_file, 0
+if $I0 goto conf
++# If installed into /usr/lib/parrot, not /usr/runtime/parrot
+# This logic has to be reversed when installed versions sho
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #57418]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57418 >
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc= gcc
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:08:30 2008, doughera wrote:
> > After running the Configure.pl test suite, I'm seeing some
> > annoying-to-remove directories staying behind in /tmp.
> >
> > $ ls -lR /tmp/qdEG6yqmCn/
> > qdEG6yqmCn/:
> > total 16
> > drwxr-xr-x
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:04:59 2008, doughera wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > The parallel branch does seem to run in about half the time. This is
> > with
> > perl-5.8.8 on Solaris/SPARC, where perl was built with Sun's cc,
On Tue Jul 29 11:08:30 2008, doughera wrote:
> After running the Configure.pl test suite, I'm seeing some
> annoying-to-remove directories staying behind in /tmp.
>
> $ ls -lR /tmp/qdEG6yqmCn/
> qdEG6yqmCn/:
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x 3 doughera faculty 181 Jul 29 13:48 alpha/
>
> qdEG6yqmCn
I wrote languages/lua/src/lib/gl.pir & glut.pir over
runtime/parrot/library/OpenGL.pir.
I obtain some success :
$ ./parrot languages/lua/lua.pbc languages/lua/demo/triangles.lua
run properly.
But the wrapper for Lua is currently incomplete. And I am not happy with
this way of doing, too
Moritz Lenz (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #57032]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57032 >
>
>
> In parrot as of r29547 I get a failure while ru
40 matches
Mail list logo
