From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:26:05 -0700
Bob Rogers wrote:
> The same Kea-CL tests are failing in pdd25cx revision 29565 . . .
In the new implementation 'pushaction' subs are no longer automatically
run when executing an exception handler o
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #57090]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57090 >
I'm beginning to enjoy 'make smolder_test'. Here is a wishlist item
for its ongoing d
Parrot has been building successfully, albeit slowly, for me on
Darwin for several months now. But I must say that the very last
line of 'make' output always shows a lot of warnings of "multiple
definitions of symbol". Can anyone evaluate these? Thanks.
/usr/bin/g++ -o pbc_merge \
s
On Fri Jul 18 08:22:48 2008, doughera wrote:
>
> Oh yes -- I did remember one other. Configure.pl currently offers you
the
> opportunity to specify different sizes for opcode_t and INTVAL. However,
> parrot itself assumes they are the same size. (See [perl #56810] for a
> little more backgr
r29352 | jkeenan | 2008-07-12 13:00:43 -0400 (Sat, 12 Jul 2008) | 4 lines
Applied 5 days ago. No complaints heard. Closing ticket.
Have tested the build tools on two different OSes and they're all
passing. Having heard no further complaints, I'm going to resolve this
ticket.
kid51
And I applied one little grammatical correction.
Since we've applied and refined the patches that Michael Peters
originally submitted, is there any particular reason to keep this RT open?
kid51
On Fri Jul 18 09:17:19 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would find this clearer if you reversed the top level conditions. In
> English, this reads:
>
> if the revision isn't defined, then do this
> otherwise do that
>
> Flipping the order changes it to:
>
> if the revisi
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57088]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57088 >
In trunk, partcl fails this way:
$ prove -v t/cmd_lsort.t >/dev/null
[oops; continuation
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
>> creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
>>
>> Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jul 17 15:53:12 2008, julianalbo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> trick. The attached patch (v5) properly fixes the problem on my system.
> There shouldn't be any rem
Unfortunately, my changes to Perl 5 have been working better than my
changes to Parrot. IIRC, the changes made fixed OpenBSD and NetBSD on
Parrot while Cygwin and Solaris didn't seem to fare as well.
Steve
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Thorsten Glaser via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On We
On Thursday 17 July 2008 14:16:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added:
>branches/gsoc_pdd09/t/op/gc.old (contents, props changed)
> Modified:
>branches/gsoc_pdd09/t/op/gc.t
>
> Log:
> [gsoc_pdd09] Temporarily remove the t/op/gc.t file. It's messing up like
> crazy and I dont know that my GC
Allison Randal wrote:
Moritz Lenz wrote:
I also get errors in parrot's PGE tests (I guess they are known already;
if not I can happily send the details)
I get no errors in PGE's tests on Mac OS X or Ubuntu as of r29552, so
please send the details.
Oh, but do make sure you've updated to the
Bob Rogers wrote:
The same Kea-CL tests are failing in pdd25cx revision 29565 as I
mentioned in this message:
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:21:06 -0400
. . . I am seeing three test failures when it should execute a
pushaction sub, but does not. Two
On Thursday 17 July 2008 19:15:52 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> + if (! defined $args->{revision}) {
> + $args->{revision} = 'unknown';
> + _print_to_cache($args->{cache}, $args->{revision});
> + return $args->{revision};
> + } else {
> + if (defined ($args->{prev}
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jul 17 15:53:12 2008, julianalbo wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > With this patch, the new tests still pass on Linux/x86. The patch uses
Added NEWS entry in r29587. Closing ticket.
On Thu Jul 17 15:53:12 2008, julianalbo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > With this patch, the new tests still pass on Linux/x86. The patch uses
> > STRING->strstart to avoid leaking a malloc'd buffer when throwing an
> > exception,
Moritz Lenz wrote:
I also get errors in parrot's PGE tests (I guess they are known already;
if not I can happily send the details)
I get no errors in PGE's tests on Mac OS X or Ubuntu as of r29552, so
please send the details.
Allison
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > 3. Are there any other configuration steps which are no longer needed?
>
> Well, I proposed eliminating the attributes and warnings tests, but I was
> overruled on that. Other than those, nothing
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:25 PM, via RT Andrew Whitworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andrew Whitworth
> # Please include the string: [perl #56968]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=5696
James Keenan via RT wrote:
I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these comments. Please
advise. Thank you very much.
The first one (line 103) refers to the
On Jul 18, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these comments. Please
advise. Thank you very much.
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
Michael:
I install TAP::Harness::Archive from CPAN, then applied the patches to a
fresh checkout from trunk. I configured, built and ran 'make
smolder_test'. The Smolder test completed and stated that it uploaded
-- though I have a tough time matching my particular
$ languages/perl6/perl6 -e'say "Hello"'
Segmentation fault
$ gdb languages/perl6/perl6
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.6-35.fc8rh)
...
(gdb) run -e'say "Hello"'
Starting program: /home/saleem/work/compiler/parrot/languages/perl6/perl6
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching
26 matches
Mail list logo
