GCC 4.4

2008-05-08 Thread Andy Lester
I've just built the 5/2/2008 snapshot of GCC 4.4 and Parrot builds fine on it. I wonder what new warning flags 4.4 has that I can exploit. xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

[perl #36283] [TODO] pasm/pir: forbid assignment syntax for inout params

2008-05-08 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
On Thu Dec 13 05:54:17 2007, kjs wrote: > On Tue Jun 14 02:30:00 2005, chip wrote: > > It makes sense to allow e.g. C<$P0 = add $P1, $P2> as alternative > > syntax for C. However, when the first parameter is > > "inout" rather than "out", assignment syntax is *not* appropriate. > > > > For exampl

Re: [perl #53890] [BUG] [PATCH] Ordered hash gc bug

2008-05-08 Thread NotFound
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:55 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your null-checking patch will work, but I don't want to add more checking to > parrot_mark_hash() right now, as it's already full of special cases. Here's > my inclination. Looks good to me. I see you also get rid ot the v

Re: [perl #53890] [BUG] [PATCH] Ordered hash gc bug

2008-05-08 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 08 May 2008 11:09:52 chromatic wrote: > That to me seems like the real problem. Did anyone experiment with using > hash_delete? > > > The problem can be fixed by checking in parrot_mark_hash that the key > > is no null before calling pobject_lives. The attached path does it. > > That

Re: [perl #53890] [BUG] [PATCH] Ordered hash gc bug

2008-05-08 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 08 May 2008 04:39:57 NotFound wrote: > Last night in #parrot particle informed of a bug in a msvc++ build. By > his suggestion, me and others were able to reproduce it in other > platforms by using the gcdebug core: > > ./parrot --runcore=gcdebug t/pmc/orderedhash_9.pasm > > Looks like

[perl #53890] [BUG] [PATCH] Ordered hash gc bug

2008-05-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by NotFound # Please include the string: [perl #53890] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53890 > Last night in #parrot particle informed of a bug in a msvc++ build. By his suggestion, me an

Re: [perl #53850] [PATCH] Add class name to exception attribute already exists

2008-05-08 Thread NotFound
Sorry, forgot to attach the patch file. -- Salu2 Index: src/pmc/class.pmc === --- src/pmc/class.pmc (revisión: 27379) +++ src/pmc/class.pmc (copia de trabajo) @@ -644,8 +644,11 @@ /* If we already have an attribute of thi

[perl #53850] [PATCH] Add class name to exception attribute already exists

2008-05-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by NotFound # Please include the string: [perl #53850] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53850 > Hello. The attached patch adds the class name to the exception attribute already exists in

[perl #53896] Re: [rt.cpan.org #35695] increment() not implemented in class 'ParrotLibrary'

2008-05-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud # Please include the string: [perl #53896] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53896 > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:34:07AM -0400, brian d foy via RT wrote: > Ticket http

Re: [perl #53142] [TODO] Cage-cleaner's request: PDD for configuration; Create RTs for new or heavily modified config steps

2008-05-08 Thread James E Keenan
On May 7, 2008, at 10:35 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell via RT wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote: On Sun Apr 20 19:01:44 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose both short-term and long-term remedies. Short-term: If you are proposing a new configurat

Parrot website "souce.html"

2008-05-08 Thread Gerd Pokorra
Hello, I want you to offer to replace the broken link "http://parrot.homelinux.org/packages"; to "ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora";. The link I think of is on the WWW-page "http://www.parrotcode.org/source.html";. You can klick there under the topic "Packages" at the link "FedoraCo

Re: [perl #53142] [TODO] Cage-cleaner's request: PDD for configuration; Create RTs for new or heavily modified config steps

2008-05-08 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 19:35:03 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote: > > > Long-term: We need a Parrot design document on configuration. Such > > > a document should cover what configuration is, why we have decided to > > > include the conf