> >
> > Test::Builder was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::More was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::Simple was first released with perl 5.006002
AFAICT, the versions of these three modules found in lib/Test/ are all
0.60. Presumably, that version was included because it h
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:18 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
The test passed at 25900.
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
OK, I know what I did to break it. I'm going to see if I can get it
to fail on OS X and then fix it the real way, rather than the way
ch
>
> The test passed at 25900.
>
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
On Fri Feb 22 19:38:42 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
>
> Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
>
I should have spoken more precisely. The revision at wh
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:41:28 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
> >> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
> > Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
> What is the fix we're talking about?
My patch in r50920, which you revert
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
What is the fix we're talking about?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
-- c
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro...21/33
# Failed test (t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t at line 298)
# ''
# doesn't match '/End of file reached/
# '
# './parrot -D40 --gc-debug
"/Users/jimk/work/parrot/t/compilers/imcc/sy
Coke:
Last weekend I applied a patch in r25788 which corrected persistent
problems in src/list.c and thereby enabled t/src/intlist.t to pass for
the first time in a month.
In this RT, you report that t/src/intlist.t is again failing -- this
time failing all its tests.
Was t/src/intlist.t passing
Patch applied in r25999. Thanks, Matt.
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #51114]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51114 >
As noted on IRC tonight:
22:35 also, if a CLA is required for commit access,
On Friday 22 February 2008 08:45:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/src/pmc/parrotinterpreter.pmc
>
> Log:
> In thawfinish, delay setting constant flag on lib_name until
> Parrot_load_lib has been called, to avoid corruption in iglobals during GC.
> This fixes segfault attempting t
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #51104]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51104 >
during the build of languages/c99, specifically:
..\..\parrot.exe -o src\CPP_PGE2AST.pbc
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think PDD19 describes the shorthand notation for invocation in
> sufficient detail.
>
> I suggest to close this ticket.
>
>
+1
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #51086]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51086 >
Howdy,
" ft=pir" was removed from the codas in languages/c99/c99.pir and
language
(forgot to cc list first time, you'll see this text twice in the ticket
history)
this issue seems to be resolved.
no reply was given on an earlier suggestion to close this ticket (i
probably forgot to cc the list)
I suggest to close this ticket.
I think PDD19 describes the shorthand notation for invocation in
sufficient detail.
I suggest to close this ticket.
On Thu Sep 20 12:00:19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2007 06:58:55 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
>
> > On Sat Mar 10 19:15:20 2007, coke wrote:
> > > From docs/BROKEN.pod.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this something that needs fixing?
> > >
> > > (it's in compilers/imcc/main.c)
a patch was sent but never applied.
I suggest to apply this patch, possibly with minor changes, and close
this ticket.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:30 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 03:48:13 Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>
> > I updated pdd19 a bit in the section for macros. All relevant
> > information is taken from docs/imcc/macros.pod.
> >
> > I suggest the latter file is no longe
20 matches
Mail list logo
