On Tuesday 08 January 2008 10:34:47 Jeff Horwitz wrote:
> After creating a new interpreter with Parrot_new(NULL) and destroying it
> with Parrot_really_destroy(), a second call to Parrot_new(NULL) segfaults.
> Parrot_really_destroy() should reset things so we can call Parrot_new()
> without a pare
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:43:24PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Please also verify that you want to publicly announce the name of the
> executable as 'perl6'. I recall there was some question about that too,
> though I wasn't involved in any of it, so I don't know where it stands at
> the mome
On Jan 13, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
If there is any doubt, it would be better to wait, and let it mature a
bit. We can always "shout it from the rooftops" at the next release.
I disagree. It need not be perfect, and I'd like to keep this
momentum going. Even if you have to do
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:59:20 -0800
On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:14:55 Andy Lester wrote:
> Parrot 0.5.2 brings a major new feature to users: The ability to build
> a perl6 executable.
>
> Parrot has been creating bytecode for years, bu
On Sun Jan 13 17:53:05 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] forgot to cc this to the
list:
> FWIW, this appears to be the code from the latest version of
> Regexp::Common::comment on CPAN:
>
> {languages => [qw {ALPACA B C C-- LPC PL/I}],
> from_to => [[qw {/* */}]]},
>
> ...
>
> {languages =
Alberto reported via email today:
Not having problems :)
All tests successful, 11 tests and 613 subtests skipped.
Closing ticket.
Alberto: Does the attached work for you?
Index: MANIFEST
===
--- MANIFEST(revision 24842)
+++ MANIFEST(working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# ex: set ro:
# $Id$
#
-# generated by tools/dev/mk_manifest_and_skip.pl Sun Jan 13 14:16:
> If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be
> easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on
> cygwin either.
That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an
ubuntu or redhat virtual machine might come in really handy. I don't
believe Per
On Mon Sep 03 12:45:03 2007, doughera wrote:
>
> Well grepping my output log file shows 18 lines, so it's more than just
> t/distro_file_metadata.t:
>
> $ egrep '(svn|svk|git): not found' build.log | wc
> 18
>
Andy D: When I invoked the same command on my most recent log of 'make
tes
bin3gIPvEpTy5.bin
Description:
With petdance's assistance, today I verified that this now works on Darwin:
perl Configure.pl
make perl6
Confirmation:
[parrot] 512 $ ll perl6
-rw-r--r-- 1 jimk jimk 807796 Jan 13 16:57 perl6
[parrot] 513 $ chmod 0755 perl6
[parrot] 514 $ ./perl6 -e 'say "Hello world"'
Hello world
... whic
hi,
I've been working a bit on Perl 1 (Punie), but writing a compiler for a
language that I never used is kinda tricky :-P
It's really nice to look at Perl 1 and see how it has evolved over time. Of
course, it'd be quite interesting to compare speed of Perl 1 and Punie (perl
1 on parrot).
Does an
This ticket has obviously not generated much interest since I opened it
lo these five months ago. Coke and I had some IRC discussion of
something he's developing that's related to it, but I haven't heard from
anyone else.
So, let me ask again: When you see the Parrot Bug Summary generated
every
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
James E Keenan wrote:
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
Forgot to tell it.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
Alberto: Are you still getting these errors? If so, could you please
add something to http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> Please put something in the top, shouting from the rooftops, that we can now
> say "make perl6".
Please verify that it actually works, first. Last I checked (Friday) it
didn't, due to linker issues. I also recall some guesswork on the list
about share
So Andy has create a list for parrot build reports - see below.
Both passing and failing builds from buildbot should start showing up
there.
Also, the ircbot is now named eigenbot and remains on #parrot, but
you have to ask it for status info - it will not automatically
announce builds (
This has been done in config/auto/warnings.pm. We've had some problems
with it, but we're working on them in another ticket (47395). So I
think we can close this ticket now.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> I had discussed the [S29/subdir/*.t] structure with
> particle over irc, but probably I misunderstood.
>
> So I'd better change these tests to something like:
>
> t/spec/S29-str/chomp.t
> t/spec/S29-str/p5chomp.t
> ...
>
I was studying Jarkko's patch this morning in preparation for applying
it. I had a number of concerns.
1. It turned out that at the point the patch was originally submitted,
HEAD had moved a bit beyond the version against which Jarkko diffed. I
had refactored some of the patched code into inter
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:29:03PM -0500, Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:20:12 -0800
>
>Where would people here want to see buildot status messages go?
>Personally, I'm not a parrot developer, so I don't have a strong
>op
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:33 PM, chromatic (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #49722]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/parrot/languages/perl6$ ./perl6
> say ucfirst('hello Perl6 on Parrot!')
Hello perl6 on parrot!
>r24793 | cspencer | 2008-01-13 03:36:20 +1000 (Вск, 13 Янв 2008) | 2 lines
>Added lcfirst/ucfirst methods to Perl6Str class.
Excuse me if it isn`t valid place or way to say that.
T
On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:14:55 Andy Lester wrote:
> It's a start, but how about this:
>
> --- begin ---
>
> Parrot 0.5.2 brings a major new feature to users: The ability to build
> a perl6 executable.
>
> Parrot has been creating bytecode for years, but the conversion of
> these Parrot bytec
On Jan 12, 2008 11:22 PM, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 0.5.2 release is coming up this Tuesday (January 15), so I've
> updated NEWS with a summary of changes since 0.5.1 based on the commit
> logs, which I've also included below. Please take a look and make sure
> I haven't misre
Patrick wrote:
I've been hoping to avoid subdirs in the SXX directories.
In other words, instead of having
S29-functions/type1/*.t
S29-functions/type2/*.t
S29-functions/type3/*.t
I'd like to see
S29-type1/*.t
S29-type2/*.t
S29-type3/*.t
The idea is to have one directory under spe
25 matches
Mail list logo
