Andy moved slurp_file() into Parrot::BuildUtil last month. So I don't
think we need to start a separate module called Parrot::Util -- at least
not yet.
I'm adding one file, t/configure/039-slurp_file.t, to provide unit tests
for Parrot::BuildUtil::slurp_file(). I also spruced up the POD in
Build
On Sat Sep 08 14:11:57 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2007 14:00:39 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
>
> > Is this restricted to just the pmc's? C also found
instances
> > in:
> >
> > src/ops/io.ops
> > src/hash.c
> > src/pmc_freeze.c
> > src/stm/backend.c
> >
> > I.e. shou
On Fr. 13. Jul. 2007, 09:47:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a comment in embed.h which says:
>
> /* XXX Parrot_init() should be removed, no longer required for
embedders */
>
> This comment has been there since April 2006. The Parrot_init()
> prototype is redundant with the one in interpr
Author: allison
Date: Sat Sep 8 14:25:24 2007
New Revision: 21146
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd25_concurrency.pod
Log:
[pdd] Add a reference to a PerlMonks thread about concurrency.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd25_concurrency.pod
=
On Saturday 08 September 2007 14:00:39 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> Is this restricted to just the pmc's? C also found instances
> in:
>
> src/ops/io.ops
> src/hash.c
> src/pmc_freeze.c
> src/stm/backend.c
>
> I.e. should these be updated/changed as well?
Hm, I thought it was, but it's not. Th
On Sat Sep 08 12:37:00 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Several PMCs use vtable methods directly, rather than going through
the
> accessor macros. These are particularly evident in bytecode freezing
and
> thawing.
>
> The existing code looks like:
>
> io->vtable->push_integer(INTERP,
jerry gay wrote:
> i've just given ron blaschke (aka ron or rblasch) a commit bit. please
> join me in welcoming him to the core committers. over the last few
> years, ron has submitted many high-quality patches, and has always
> been willing to share his knowledge of windows-based programming.
Ma
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #45281]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45281 >
Several PMCs use vtable methods directly, rather than going through the
accessor macros.
David Fetter wrote:
Would people here be interested in running clients on various
architectures, OSs, compilers, etc.? What kinds of things would you
like to see in a status overview page
I was discussing this with ptc off-list today.
What I would most like out of a page which consolidates
On Do. 26. Apr. 2007, 16:45:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now it makes sense. :) Anyway, I found this by following the Compiler FAQ,
> which says that a new closure should be created by cloning the sub. I
think
> it should be changed to say newclosure, or even explain this (because you
> might r
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #45267]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45267 >
In t/run/options.t there is a TODO test for the '--trace' option of parrot.
It l
Jeff Horwitz wrote:
> It gives me great pleasure to introduce you to the world's first
> mod_perl6 handlers! They are run using Parrot's Perl6 compiler on top
> of mod_parrot, and are compiled on the fly the first time a handler is
> called. Each handler is passed an [Apache;RequestRec] object
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
