[perl #45219] [PATCH] Class to 'Class' clean-up in t/pmc

# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie # Please include the string: [perl #45219] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45219 > Convert Class to 'Class' in t/pmc/*.t. Three tests were marked as TODO because they req

Re: [perl #40599] [NEW] Coding standards test of return statements

On 05/09/07, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Do. 26. Okt. 2006, 03:32:14, ptc wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This file is actually a hack of the C sub in > > C and checks that return > > statements look like C rather than C. > > This isn't a firm standard like many of the other

Re: [perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:26 PM, chromatic via RT wrote: Here you go! -- c === lib/Parrot/Configure/Options/Test.pm == --- lib/Parrot/Configure/Options/Test.pm(revision 5702) +++ lib/Parrot/Configure/Options/Test.pm(l

[perl #43341] [TODO] config/inter/progs.pm: Write unit tests

On Tue Sep 04 05:20:44 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. Assuming no one else speaks up for it, I > will delete it in 1-2 days. > This patch deletes the antiquated code -- but also does a bit more refactoring to eliminate the last patches of code uncovered by test

[perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

Patch applied to trunk in r21099.

Re: [perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

On Wednesday 05 September 2007 18:02:26 James Keenan via RT wrote: > chromatic wrote: > > That looks reasonable, but why does the code use prove in the first > > place, and not Test::Harness::runtests()? > > And why not? For the same reason to use Perl's built-in file manipulation routines inste

[perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

chromatic wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2007 09:45:53 Andy Dougherty wrote: > > That looks reasonable, but why does the code use prove in the first place, and > not Test::Harness::runtests()? > And why not? >From 'perldoc Test::Harness': "STOP! If all you want to do is write a test scri

Some Thoughts on Windows Linking and Loading

Linking and loading is arguably one of the more difficult things on Windows. I'd like to let you know about how some of the things work. I think this is important because there are still some issues with that we need to sort out. Not sure if I get everything right here, so please feel free to co

Re: [perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

On Wednesday 05 September 2007 09:45:53 Andy Dougherty wrote: > I stumbled upon this one while trying 'Configure.pl --test'. My default > system perl is unsuitable for building parrot. I just specify the full > path to the perl I actually want to use, and everything just works. > > Well, almost.

[perl #45201] [PATCH] Be sure to call the correct 'prove' program.

# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #45201] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45201 > I stumbled upon this one while trying 'Configure.pl --test'. My default system perl i

Re: [perl #44997] Failure in t/configure/029-option_or_data.t

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote: > Having heard no objection -- in fact, having heard nothing at all -- I > committed these revised tests to trunk in r21081. Resolving ticket. Sorry, I didn't have a chance to test it -- the one test I did have a chance to run failed on the gdbmhas

[perl #45185] [PATCH] add a tutorial for exists opcode

# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie # Please include the string: [perl #45185] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45185 > This patch adds tutorial information about exists. It was written completely from scra

Re: [perl #45189] [PATCH] Remove Deprecated PGE Syntax

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 12:29:56AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > This patch removes a bit of deprecated syntax. Unfortunately, its only > location within the tree is within the Win32-specific parts of File::Spec, so > I can't test it. > > Is there a Win32 hacker who can verify that it works? While

[perl #45179] [PATCH] adding more notes about string length to tutorial (and test)

# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie # Please include the string: [perl #45179] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45179 > This patch talks more about the length opcode, and on which kinds of variables it can b

Re: [perl #41500] [TODO] config - lib directory needs to be set appropriately for 32/64 bit archs

On 05/09/07, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue Feb 13 08:42:29 2007, ptc wrote: > > In config/init/defaults.pm the lib install path needs to be set > > correctly for 32 and 64 bit architecture systems. > > > Paul: This is one of those tickets that you created on the basis of

[perl #45189] [PATCH] Remove Deprecated PGE Syntax

# New Ticket Created by chromatic # Please include the string: [perl #45189] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45189 > This patch removes a bit of deprecated syntax. Unfortunately, its only location within th