Steve Peters wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:50:56AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
The results of a recent run of Devel::Cover along with the tests run
with the patch submitted in
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42690 may be seen here:
http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/co
On 5/10/07, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:33:41AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >So, !s->strlen does scan as quickly and easily.
> >
>
> To some, but it isn't as easy to just literally read. "Not s's strl
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:33:41AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >So, !s->strlen does scan as quickly and easily.
> >
>
> To some, but it isn't as easy to just literally read. "Not s's strlen"
> is a lot different than "STRING_IS_EMTPY". Sin
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Ok, I've got it compiling, at least. I'll let it run tests overnight and
> submit a cleaned-up patch tomorrow. I've gone back and reviewed the
> alignment issue and think I have implemented it sanely.
Hmm. Rats. My initial version required more in
On Thursday 10 May 2007 02:37:15 Mike Mattie wrote:
> quick patch to use the mem_sys_free wrapper instead of using the platform's
> free() directly.
I only see an OpenPGP signature attachment; can you respond with the patch
attached again (or inline, I suppose). If it's a small change, I could
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:50:56AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> The results of a recent run of Devel::Cover along with the tests run
> with the patch submitted in
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42690 may be seen here:
> http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/c
# New Ticket Created by Mike Mattie
# Please include the string: [perl #42918]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42918 >
Hello,
quick patch to use the mem_sys_free wrapper instead of using the platform's
free
On 5/8/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually changed every instance of 'vtable method' to 'vtable
function' a few days ago to help clear up the confusion. (A vtable
function does have an invocant 'self' but doesn't act as a method in any
other way.) But, while I was adding the
Author: smash
Date: Thu May 10 04:15:31 2007
New Revision: 18493
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd17_pmc.pod
Log:
[PDD]
* fix pdd17_pmc.pod pod errors
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd17_pmc.pod
==
--- trunk/doc
The results of a recent run of Devel::Cover along with the tests run
with the patch submitted in
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42690 may be seen here:
http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/coverage.html
kid51
On May 9, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:06:49PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 12:53:57 Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:41:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+
+#define STRING_IS_NULL(s) ((s) == NULL)
+#define STRING_
11 matches
Mail list logo
