Re: [perl #42106] t/pmc/iterator.t t/src/io.t failed on Linux

2007-03-26 Thread Eric Hanchrow
I think that's my code; I'm looking into it. -- I'd like to see Rush Limbaugh tell Omar he can't get married. --Alex Kotlowitz. You hadda be there

[perl #42110] [PATCH] Returning values from void functions

2007-03-26 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters # Please include the string: [perl #42110] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42110 > A couple of functions in XX are trying to return values from void functions. To some com

[perl #42107] [PATCH] Intel C++ is not gcc

2007-03-26 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters # Please include the string: [perl #42107] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42107 > Intel C++ identifies itself as gcc. Often this can lead to unusual failures throughout

[perl #42106] t/pmc/iterator.t t/src/io.t failed on Linux

2007-03-26 Thread James Keenan via RT
Error in the previous report: t/src/io.t failed during 'make test' (both times I ran it), but appears to have passed when run with 'prove'. Here's what I saw during 'make test'. t/src/io.Failed to delete temp.file at t/src/io.t line 46. # Looks like you planne

[perl #42106] t/pmc/iterator.t t/src/io.t failed on Linux

2007-03-26 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #42106] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42106 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.15 arch= i386-linux-thread-multi cc= cc --- Flags:

[perl #42105] memory leak in PCCMETHOD together with Parrot_runops_fromc

2007-03-26 Thread Richard Hundt
# New Ticket Created by "Richard Hundt" # Please include the string: [perl #42105] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42105 > Hi, The following PMC leaks memory at about 55Mb/100 calls to `call()' #include

Re: A challenge... about Parrot

2007-03-26 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Alberto Simões wrote: There will be a conference about languages, compilers, interpreters and so on, in Portugal. It is an "international" conference, or at least they claim so. It's page is at http://corta.di.ubi.pt/ and the call for papers is at http://corta.di.ubi.pt/cfp.html. Sounds cool;

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-26 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 3/26/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not sure about the details of this issue, but r17772 seems to build fine on Cygwin. Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to work on Cygwin for months. The reason has changed since this specific ticket but if you have a wor

Re: [svn:parrot-pdd] r17711 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

2007-03-26 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Nicholas Clark wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:13:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +It is fine to use both C and C with a single role. However, +placing a method name in the exclude list and also aliasing it has undefined +behaviour. Is it possible to detect this and merely make i

Re: [svn:parrot-pdd] r17711 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

2007-03-26 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:13:08AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +It is fine to use both C and C with a single role. However, > +placing a method name in the exclude list and also aliasing it has undefined > +behaviour. Is it possible to detect this and merely make it a fatal error? Nicholas

[perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-26 Thread Ron Blaschke
Not sure about the details of this issue, but r17772 seems to build fine on Cygwin. Here's the output of "make test" on my box. Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/codingstd/

A challenge... about Parrot

2007-03-26 Thread Alberto Simões
Hi There will be a conference about languages, compilers, interpreters and so on, in Portugal. It is an "international" conference, or at least they claim so. It's page is at http://corta.di.ubi.pt/ and the call for papers is at http://corta.di.ubi.pt/cfp.html. This is not a *known* conferen

First Perl 6 Microgrant - Steve Peters on Parrot Portability

2007-03-26 Thread jesse
We're pleased to announce that we've selected Steve Peters as the recipient of the first Perl 6 microgrant. Steve has been instrumental in helping to ensure that Perl 5 has stayed incredibly portable for the past few years. Steve's starting to turn some of his attention to Parrot. You can find de

Syntax for Constructing new Objects (and classes?)

2007-03-26 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
Hello, I have a short and simple question w.r.t. syntax for constructing new objects for the architect :-) Currently, it's done through: new P0, .Integer or in PIR: $P0 = new Integer # or .Integer I thought to have read somewhere this will be changed into something like this: $P0 = Inte

Re: [perl #41195] [PATCH] Hints must come early in Configure.pl

2007-03-26 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, chromatic wrote: > On Saturday 24 March 2007 05:26, James E Keenan wrote: > > > Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > Hints need to come *before* inter/progs. The hints set up various > > > platform-specific callbacks to be performed after the different programs > > > are selected.

Parrot Bug Summary

2007-03-26 Thread Parrot Bug Summary
Parrot Bug Summary http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html Generated at Mon Mar 26 14:01:10 2007 GMT --- * Numbers * New Issues * Overview of Open Issues * Ticket Status By Version * Requestors with m

[perl #42073] [BUG]: compilers/pirc/Makefile not cleaned up by 'make realclean'

2007-03-26 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Mon Mar 26 00:53:31 2007, kjs wrote: > Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > > James Keenan wrote: > >>[snip] > >> Please try the patch attached. > >> > >> It more closely follows the pattern in config/gen/makefiles/root.in > >> -- specifically it categorizes your Makefile as a STICKY_FILE. > > > > It does r

[perl #42082] [BUG]: Configure.pl: Misspecified option; 2 non-valid options documented

2007-03-26 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Mar 25 23:00:09 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2007, at 9:34 PM, James Keenan (via RT) wrote: > > > > > 1. Configure.pl has a lexical @valid_opts (starting at line 284 for > > me). One of the elements of this array is: 'verbose-step=N'. > > Shouldn't this really be: 'ver