On Saturday 30 December 2006 15:42, James Keenan wrote:
> You didn't get the most recent version of the tests.
>
> I think part of the problem is that, in the case of the 8 test files
> and lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/Utils.pm, I was submitting completely new files
> (hence, svn adds) rather than patching ex
On Saturday 30 December 2006 05:47, James Keenan wrote:
> Can you send me some output with test failures? They've passed
> repeatedly on my machine.
>
> Please note that the pmc2cutil tests should only be run at a point
> *after* you've called perl Configure.pl but *before* you've called
> 'make'
Perhaps a helpful failure message when run at the wrong time would help.
On Dec 30, 2006, at 8:47 AM, James Keenan wrote:
On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Kevin Tew via RT wrote:
I modified the root.in changes to follow the conventions already
present
in the file.
The following composite patc
On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Kevin Tew via RT wrote:
I modified the root.in changes to follow the conventions already
present
in the file.
The following composite patch builds and passes parrot tests.
However the pmc2cutil tests are not passing. Could you post a new
diff
that includes pa
# New Ticket Created by "Lee Duhem"
# Please include the string: [perl #41154]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41154 >
This patch makes code struct and output of examples/pasm/stack.pasm
more consistent, for
