Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2006 01:58 schrieb Karl Forner:
> Hi,
>
> I coud not find detailed specifications for these PMCs, so I was wondering
> what should happen
> when they are (re)sized.
The Fixed* variants don't resize.
Yes unfilled are is set to the default value. See below
> For example:
>
On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:29 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Hi all,
In the process of trying to finish off the perl coda cage task, I
notice that the Perl::Critic policy for the emacs/vim coda skips
__END__ and __DATA__ sections at the end of perl files, however vim (I
don't know about emacs) requires the
Hi all,
In the process of trying to finish off the perl coda cage task, I
notice that the Perl::Critic policy for the emacs/vim coda skips
__END__ and __DATA__ sections at the end of perl files, however vim (I
don't know about emacs) requires the coda to be within either the
first or last 5 lines
Author: chromatic
Date: Mon Oct 2 18:06:40 2006
New Revision: 14831
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd13_bytecode.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/ (props changed)
Log:
Minor POD formatting fixes to make the POD checking test pass again.
Modified: trun
This weekend's project (committed as r14830) makes continuations
capture the dynamic environment so that they can restore it properly on
invocation. This makes it possible for multiple continuations to
coexist that return to different environments in the same context.
One word of caution, t
Hi,
I coud not find detailed specifications for these PMCs, so I was wondering
what should happen
when they are (re)sized.
For example:
a = new FixedBooleanArray
a = 3
So a has been (re)sized in order to be able to hold 3 elements, but what
should be the value of these elements ?
Do they
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Will Coleda wrote:
I took a first pass at a perlcritic test: t/codingstd/
perlcritic.t ; this test isn't run by default.
[snip]
Cool! Attached is a patch to simplify this test code a little bit by
leveraging Test::Perl::Critic. I also reworked
CodeLayout::Us
Hi there!
I'm starting an experimental C project that will embed parrot.
I'd like my program to be as portable as parrot itself, so my question is:
Can I take advantage of parrot's portableness?
For example, if my program does some IO stuff, can I use Parrot's IO
subsystem in my C code to do this s
Update pdump patch
Kevin Tew wrote:
The attached patch is my first step at locating bug #40438.
It adds pdump -d functionality for keys.
Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Thanks, I've applied a modified version of the patch, showing that it's
a namespace issue caused by the .HLL line. Using .loa
=== src/pdb.c
==
--- src/pdb.c (revision 133)
+++ src/pdb.c (local)
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@
PDB_t *pdb;
void *yyscanner;
-do_yylex_init ( &yyscanner );
/*Parrot_set_config_hash(); TODO link with cfg */
debu
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Oct 2 13:15:04 2006 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
11 matches
Mail list logo