# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38724]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38724 >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/parrot$ cat test.pir
.sub main :main
$P0 = eval("print
Author: chip
Date: Mon Mar 13 15:41:32 2006
New Revision: 11894
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod
Log:
Undeprecate the MAYBE_FLAT bit, which (contrary to my mistaken memory) is
not unused, but is in fact very often used for Perl 6.
New features: (1) When a hash value is
Audrey, I just committed the below to pdd03 because I think it'll work for
Pugs. What say?
6 MAYBE_FLAT
If this bit is set on a PMC value, and:
(a) the PMC is either an aggregate or a scalar containing a
reference to an aggregate, and
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:08:06AM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
> In r11754, you had deprecated the use of the MAYBE_FLAT flag, but there
> is no mention of this in the commit log.
I just thought nobody was using it; braino. I didn't intend it to go away
until we had gone through a public discussion
Hi Chip,
In r11754, you had deprecated the use of the MAYBE_FLAT flag, but there
is no mention of this in the commit log.
Consider this Perl 6 snippet:
foo(@x, @y);
sub foo (@x, @y) { }
versus:
foo(@x, @y);
sub foo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) { }
how should I emit the call for foo() w
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything:
I'd do:
setline ... delete, doesn't make sense
getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it
setfile ... delete
getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it
setpackagedelete
getpackagedel
