On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 05:23:55PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote:
> > Do you, perchance, sit behind an http proxy server?
>
> Not that I know of (though I'm not sure how I'd know), and no other mode
> of communication is similarly affected (i.e. cvs, rsync, etc.,
From: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:23:55 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote:
> Try:
> time svn co https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk
svn: Unrecognized URL scheme 'https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk'
I don't know why. I
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, jesse wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
> > > > real0m16.84s
> > > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/
On 2/17/06, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ svn --version
> svn, version 1.1.4 (r13838)
>compiled May 13 2005, 06:29:47
>
> How bout you?
>
can't hurt to upgrade...
>svn --version
svn, version 1.3.0 (r17949)
compiled Jan 15 2006, 23:18:48
~jerry
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
> > > real0m16.84s
> > > $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk
> > > real 2:01:50.3
> >
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny.
> >
> > $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
> >
> > real0m16.84s
> > user0m0.09s
> > sys 0m0.20s
>
Andy~
On 2/17/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> > All~
> >
> > On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > > > snapshots or releases. And, since a
> Sigh. I wish it were that simple, or that funny.
>
> $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
>
> real0m16.84s
> user0m0.09s
> sys 0m0.20s
>
> $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk
>
> real 2:01:50.3
> user 1:02.0
> sys
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Matt Fowles wrote:
> All~
>
> On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> > > > time I checked) I tend to be too la
All~
On 2/17/06, jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> > > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch.
> >
> > Only if you'r
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:38:26AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> > snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> > time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch.
>
> Only if you're checking out to a Commodore 64.
Or possibly hand-transcri
> snapshots or releases. And, since a checkout takes about an hour (last
> time I checked) I tend to be too lazy to fetch one just to make a patch.
Only if you're checking out to a Commodore 64.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp$ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk
parrot-trunk > /dev/null
re
Bob Rogers wrote:
I couldn't agree more. Committed as r11609. Should I also get rid of
the CHUNKED_CTX_MEM references in interpreter.h?
Hmm, doesn't harm but is OTOH confusing. Maybe adding some comment would
be best for now.
-- Bob
leo
As of r11568 all configuration step's ->runstep() method is required to
return $self unless it wants to indicate a fatal error. An error string
is expected to be returned via the ->result() method. The steps we're
previously changed to conform to this behavior but Parrot::Configure now
requires i
Is this bug resolved? If not, what platforms is it still failing on?
-J
--
> [doughera - Mon Feb 13 09:10:50 2006]:
>
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Allison Randal wrote:
>
> > On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:56, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
> > >
> > > I too had seen this memory problem before on Solaris/SPAR
15 matches
Mail list logo
