On 12/25/05, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
Sorry, it wasn't intentional that I was sending HTML emails; only just noticed.
Nick
Guys,
On 12/24/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 24, 2005, at 21:07, Nick Glencross wrote:
>
> > ... The configuration comes when the application is additionally linked
> > with null_config.o, parrot_config.o or install_config.
>
> This was an initial attempt that allowed
On Dec 24, 2005, at 21:07, Nick Glencross wrote:
... The configuration comes when the application is additionally linked
with null_config.o, parrot_config.o or install_config.
This was an initial attempt that allowed even an installed parrot to
find the runtime by linking a config file with
On 12/23/05, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Below are my thoughts on this patch in it's current form.
>
> I don't like the function of ld_libparrot_soname because it has the
> soname mixed up with the linker flags. I'd rather see something like
> ld_soflags and libparrot_soname (I d
On 12/23/05, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> I'll try to take a look at all of this patch today. Quick questions -
> why is:
>
> +src/install_config.o [main]lib
>
> being added to MANIFEST.generated?
>
> -J
>
>
Let me explain my reasoning on this
