Mac OS X Build Errors (0.4.0)

2005-12-07 Thread Brent Fulgham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In addition to the shootout machine, I have a main development box that runs Mac OS X (PowerPC). I attempted to build Parrot 0.4.0 on this machine and encountered errors. The mailing list archive seems to be down at the moment, so I could not

Parrot Shootout

2005-12-07 Thread Brent Fulgham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A long while back someone made a request for people to create parrot implementations of the shootout tests on Alioth (http:// shootout.alioth.debian.org). I wanted to let you know that I have updated the shootout build machine with parrot (

load_bytecode no longer loads PBCs from the CWD

2005-12-07 Thread Bob Rogers
The change below means that the following code no longer works for loading non-Parrot compiled libraries from the current directory: load_bytecode "structures.pbc" Must I specify an absolute pathname to get the original behavior? -- Bob Rogers

Re: [perl #37792] [TODO] dir reorg: move imcc/ to compilers/imcc/

2005-12-07 Thread jerry gay
On 11/29/05, via RT jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this will likely require configure, makefile, build, and documentation > modifications. this should be grouped with other compiler/-related > modifications. > Note: see the parent ticket for more information. > RT is still down. so, i'll c

Re: library loading cleanup

2005-12-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Dec 6, 2005, at 16:08, jerry gay wrote: On 12/6/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2) I'm very much inclined to remove the Win32 special casing (see also r8673) There are already 2 possibilities to specify the runtime prefix (where libs are searched). a) perl Configure --prefix

Re: Parrot 0.4.0 "Luthor" Released!

2005-12-07 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 20:26 -0500, Michael Cummings wrote: > I realize I'm talking to myself at this point (last post, promise), but > my last message failed to explain the paste at the top. On a box without > svk, using the 0.4.0 released tarball, all is fine (t/perl/manifest.t is > skipped/faile

Re: [PATCH] Bug: :flat and :slurpy don't mix

2005-12-07 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:44:32 +0100 On Dec 7, 2005, at 5:39, Bob Rogers wrote: > Turns out this is because of "premature optimization" Argh - sorry. That shouldn't have been on of course. I did some benchmarking and must have forgotte

manifest.t (was: Parrot 0.4.0 "Luthor" Released!)

2005-12-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:26, Michael Cummings wrote: I realize I'm talking to myself at this point (last post, promise), but my last message failed to explain the paste at the top. On a box without svk, using the 0.4.0 released tarball, all is fine (t/perl/manifest.t is skipped/failed quickly).

Re: [PATCH] Bug: :flat and :slurpy don't mix

2005-12-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Dec 7, 2005, at 5:39, Bob Rogers wrote: Turns out this is because of "premature optimization" Argh - sorry. That shouldn't have been on of course. I did some benchmarking and must have forgotten to disable it. It is ment to access the signature array faster. The type of the signature arr