Resolved by bug #37692. Something on the TODO list actually got done. ;)
-J
--
BuildSmart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've visited both these sites, I was unable to find a download for perl6
>
> I'm not particularly interested in an implementation of it, what I'd
> like is the source code for it so I can build it.
Perl 6 is still in the design phase. The only version of it
On Nov 16, 2005, at 19:43 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.parrotcode.org talks about the VM on which Perl 6 will run.
Are perl5 scripts compatible with perl6??
No, there is an effort to write a Perl 5 compiler for Parrot (which is
the VM that Perl 6 will run on)
http://www.ponieco
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Similarly, we should avoid SHA-1 for any permanent purpose, though in
>> the short term it's not quite dead yet. No one has demonstrated an
>> ability to create SHA-1 collisions on demand (as far as I've heard,
>> anyway), but SHA-1 is "a wounded fish
http://www.parrotcode.org talks about the VM on which Perl 6 will run.
>
> Are perl5 scripts compatible with perl6??
No, there is an effort to write a Perl 5 compiler for Parrot (which is
the VM that Perl 6 will run on)
http://www.poniecode.org/
>
> Where can I download the perl6 source code?
I'm new to the list and have a couple of questions.
Are perl5 scripts compatible with perl6??
Where can I download the perl6 source code???
-- Dale
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:32:01PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: >Some basic questions: is there a notion of "current time" in Parrot,
: >like
: >a cycle counter or anything? I don't see any instructions I could get
: >one
: >from inside a PASM program, and I didn't see any of the .c files
: >
> [leo - Fri Oct 07 02:11:28 2005]:
>
> During opcode cleanup the find_word_boundary opcode ceased to exist
> (there was no is_word_boundary).
>
> We probably want to have this as a builtin "character class".
I think we can just deprecate (or omit) find_word_boundary altogether as
an opcode. I
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #37692]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37692 >
This transaction appears to have no contentThis patch does away with the use of $(MAK
On 11/16/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Glencross wrote:
> > coroutine_3.pasm seems to have some problems with scratchpads, but I
> > don't know whether the problem is with parrot or the test.
>
> > ==15739== Thread 1:
> > ==15739== Invalid write of size 1
>
> Yep. I have see
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:44:36PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> * The SHA-2 family (including SHA-256 and other variants) is showing no
>signs of weakness AFAIK.
> * Whirlpool [**] seems strong enough too; Bruce Schneier describes it
>as "a good choice".
Not to make a long discussion
"I don't know if you guys have been keeping up with current events,
but MD5 just got its ass kicked!" - with apologies to Private Hudson
It's been known for some time in the crypto world that MD5 is weak, that
there are shortcuts to finding hash collisions. Recently, that weakness
has turned int
On Nov 16, 2005, at 19:27, Erik Paulson wrote:
Hello,
As a class project, we're looking at transactional memory, and one of
things
we'd like to try and do is add some basic TM support to Parrot.
Cool.
To start out with, we'd add three new opcodes - one to begin, end, and
abort the curre
Hello,
As a class project, we're looking at transactional memory, and one of things
we'd like to try and do is add some basic TM support to Parrot.
To start out with, we'd add three new opcodes - one to begin, end, and
abort the current transaction. the BeginTX op would save a continuation,
ab
Attached is a patch that changes the "find word" test in string_cs.t
to use the find_cclass and find_not_cclass opcodes to locate word
boundaries.
This test doesn't work exactly the way Leo has envisioned it (creating
a special .CCLASS_* value for word boundaries), but it demonstrates
how I th
Nick Glencross wrote:
coroutine_3.pasm seems to have some problems with scratchpads, but I
don't know whether the problem is with parrot or the test.
==15739== Thread 1:
==15739== Invalid write of size 1
Yep. I have seen the overwrite too with scratchpads. But as scratchpads
will be removed
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:29:21AM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> All but one test are passing again in tcl. The failing test boils
> down to this PIR:
> [...]
>
> So, are all these ways of preparing arguments to Glob incorrect? (and
> if so, what's the right way?), or does this behavior point to
coroutine_3.pasm seems to have some problems with scratchpads, but I
don't know whether the problem is with parrot or the test.
In line 105 of lexical.c (r10019) there is a buffer being overflowed
because the buffer for base is larger than pad_pmc.
valgrind reports 4 occurrences of this for t
All but one test are passing again in tcl. The failing test boils
down to this PIR:
.sub '' :main
load_bytecode 'PGE.pbc'
load_bytecode 'PGE/Glob.pbc'
$P1 = find_global 'PGE', 'glob'
$S1 = unicode:"\u03b1"
$S1 = downcase $S1
$S2 = unicode:"\u0391"
$S2 = downcase $S2
$P2 = $P
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #37691]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37691 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.14-rc4
arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
cc=
20 matches
Mail list logo
