Re: Branch Review

2005-09-25 Thread Chip Salzenberg
This is pretty long as is, so I'm going to leave out all the things I agree with. On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Chip writes: > > * optional parameter interface: ":opt_count" -> ":opt_flag" > > So ":opt_count" should be replaced with ":opt_flag", which set

Re: [perl #17490] Magic is useless unless verifiable.

2005-09-25 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:04:16AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > * Expands the header to be 32 bytes in size. OK > * The magic number is no longer an opcode outside the header. It is > now an 8 byte magic string at the the beginning of the header. I should think four would do, but no m

Re: [perl #17490] Magic is useless unless verifiable.

2005-09-25 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 12:24:52PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg via RT wrote: > I think the right answer is to use a magic string rather than a > magic number. Leo and I been discussing this on #parrot and we've come to the same conclusion. Attached is a possible patch for parrotbyte.pod that implement

Re: [perl #17490] Magic is useless unless verifiable.

2005-09-25 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote: > > > Mark Biggar writes: > > > d) use a magic number that can also be used as the byte order indicator. > > I have seen architectures that swap byte ordering for 8 byte things > (like doubles) but not 4 byte things. So that gives 3 op

[perl #37258] loadlib and libraries with '.' in the name

2005-09-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Ross # Please include the string: [perl #37258] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37258 > email thread discussing the issue: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/30

Call for IRIX testers - was Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-09-25 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
Does anyone has access to an IRIX machine? -J -- On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:37:44PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > > > Jarkko, > > > > Are there still outstanding issues on IRIX? AFAIK nobody else has been > > building parrot on that platform. > > Unfortunately I no more have access t