Thanks to Matt Diephouse, partcl (parrot on tcl) is now able to run
part of tcl's cvs-latest test suite. We don't run enough of tcl at
the moment to run the tests natively, but by pulling the tests out of
the tcltest framework and converting them (sanely, we hope), we are
now passing > 10%
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #36438]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36438 >
Leo would like it if the tcl todo tests were silent instead of verbose.
Someone pleas
On Jun 30, 2005, at 21:55, Matt Fowles wrote:
Leo~
On 6/30/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice summary with examples:
ftp://ftp.inf.puc-rio.br/pub/docs/techreports/04_15_moura.pdf
and we still have to define semantics of parrot couroutines, e.g. WRT
argument passing. See al
Leo~
On 6/30/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice summary with examples:
>
> ftp://ftp.inf.puc-rio.br/pub/docs/techreports/04_15_moura.pdf
>
> and we still have to define semantics of parrot couroutines, e.g. WRT
> argument passing. See also Dan's blogs about couroutines,
I pre
Nice summary with examples:
ftp://ftp.inf.puc-rio.br/pub/docs/techreports/04_15_moura.pdf
and we still have to define semantics of parrot couroutines, e.g. WRT
argument passing. See also Dan's blogs about couroutines,
leo
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > { This is a partial reply; what with YAPC I didn't finish, but a new
> > version of the patch from Leo will give me time to catch up }
> >
> > I've reviewed the patch. I appreciate what you're doing with it, but
> > there
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:36 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > Its been a while since I tinkered with parrot so I thought I'd start
> > playing again...but I've hit a segfault.
>
> Should of course not happen... But it seems that the codegen is mixing
> old and new calling c
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #36437]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36437 >
Attempting to come up with a simplistic math grammar that has one possible
operand (A)
Brian Wheeler wrote:
Its been a while since I tinkered with parrot so I thought I'd start
playing again...but I've hit a segfault.
Should of course not happen... But it seems that the codegen is mixing
old and new calling conventions.
The trace:
8233 set I0, 1- I0=1,
8236 set I
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> During testing of the upcoming changes to the context handling [1] I
> realized that some PGE tests [2] are only failing with this patch installed.
> I traced the created code on two different machines (the other w/o the
> patch)
During testing of the upcoming changes to the context handling [1] I
realized that some PGE tests [2] are only failing with this patch installed.
I traced the created code on two different machines (the other w/o the
patch) and diffed the trace log. After a few rounds through the match
loop, one
11 matches
Mail list logo
