Re: [svn:parrot] rev 8287 - in trunk/languages/tcl: . lib lib/commands t

With this patch, Tcl is now failing the same two tests for me that it's been failing for leo: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/cmd_break.t 1 256 21 50.00% 2 t/cmd_con

Re: Regarding Google's Summer of Code 2005

At 01:40 PM 6/3/2005, Matt Fowles wrote: > I have been working and thinking about improvements to the Parrot/IMCC > optimizer for a while now. Implementing SSA is definitely at the top > of my list, because it simplifies a lot of optimizations and makes > some others possible. The biggest chall

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

I didn't realize I was still on this list (which I'm going to take care of in a bit) but since I'm seeing this... At 5:07 PM -0700 6/6/05, Edward Peschko wrote: But it still strikes me as odd. I saw some tension in the perl6 mailing lists, but nothing that would have suggested that *this* woul

[perl #36200] Parrot on Linux/m68k test failures

# New Ticket Created by Joshua Juran # Please include the string: [perl #36200] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36200 > A 'make test' of parrot failed some tests on Linux/m68k. Here is the contents of mycon

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:26:28AM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > This is an average for perl5-porters over its entire existence? > > I don't think that it's a reputation it deserves any more. It's very a > > very uneventful list

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > > > SV> Three cheers for Dan! > > Do we need to stop at 3? > > > In fact, at face value, t

Alignment Problems (Was Re: Building nci/dynclasses on HP-UX)

> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > Nick Glencross wrote: > > > > > I fear that there may be some pointer alignment problems in hash because > > > I'm > > > getting hangs which seem to be linked to finding strings in hash tables. > > > (That's pure conjecture) > > > > I'm not awa

Re: Building Parrot with MinGW, ActivePerl & command.com

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [iso-8859-1] François PERRAD wrote: > I work with MinGW, ActivePerl & cmd.exe. > I introduced the configuration variable slash_exec. > On all platform 'slash' == 'slash_exec' > except with MinGW where : > slash => '/' (need by mingw32-make) > 'slash_exec' => '

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > SV> Three cheers for Dan! Do we need to stop at 3? > In fact, at face value, the perl6 mailing lists seemed freshly absent from > strife. > They are IMO ten ti

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 Larry Wall wrote: > I'll be glad to point out that one of the most *irritating* problems > is people who snipe from the sidelines without having earned the > right to do so by contributing. Dan has earned the right to carp, > and deserves our respect for refusing to vent (muc

Re: What the heck is... wrong with Parrot development?

Larry, On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:31:01PM +0200, anonymous coward wrote: : It's a funny old world... : wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog. : Go and see: . : : Hence the subject. : : What the heck is wrong w

Re: [perl #36162] [PATCH] Emacs pasm major mode

Jacinto S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch expands on the documentation in C, > namely how the Emacs pasm mode should be installed. I've also made > some additions to C which adds highlighting for pasm > registers as well as some extended highlighting for IMCC syntax. Thanks, applied - r8

Re: [PATCH] Re: HP-UX build notes

Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patch below goes on top of yours and renames it link_shared. Thanks, applied - r8284 leo