All~
On Apr 2, 2005 3:53 PM, William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know, no one is working on these at the moment.
>
> Volunteers welcome, of course. ^_^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hi,all
> > have a Php compiler to parrot project?
> > have a ruby compiler to parrot projec
As far as I know, no one is working on these at the moment.
Volunteers welcome, of course. ^_^
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,all
have a Php compiler to parrot project?
have a ruby compiler to parrot project?
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or even:
> nmake win32-installer
> ?
> The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi".
Maybe then:
nmake win32-inno-installer
nmake win32-msi-installer
...
(which make the win32 prefix rather superfluent)
> Ron
leo
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:22:43AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >: On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 23:46 -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: >:
: >: In P6, an object is a data-type. It's not a reference, and any member
: >: payload is attached directly to the variable.
:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I add a new target 'setup' in the main Makefile.
>> That's allow the creation of a setup-parrot-x.y.z.exe ('standard' binary
>> distribution) that contains all parrot install directories and the ICU
>> shared libraries.
> Shou
hi,all
have a Php compiler to parrot project?
have a ruby compiler to parrot project?
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The documentation for spawnw (F) says:
>> Spawn a subprocess and wait for it to finish. The return status,
>> which is very system-dependent, goes in $1.
> Yeah. What does Perl5?
$?
"This is just the 16-bit status word returne
Forgot to add: in many environments (at least SGI/MIPS, AIX Power/PPC,
HP-UX/HPPA) things are even more interesting -- one can in compile time
decide between different 32-bit modes and different 64-bit modes.
(E.g. in IRIX there are two of each.) I believe the new x86-ish
processors and Linux/gcc
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. (I wish I still had Cray 90 access, the unusual-but-legal
> longsize=ptrsize=intsize=shortsize=8 nicely shook bugs to the bright
> light of day in Perl 5.)
Would break nicely ;)
leo
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can 2 different bytecode segments each try to define a new infix operator?
> If so, how do they number their infix operators to avoid a clash?
The same problem arises with user defined opcodes or generally for a
name => index mapping for which the assem
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there currently any method of determining the depth of the lexical scope
>> pad stack? None of the ops in var.pod seem to be able to provide that
>> information at the moment...
You can query the pad depth like in [1], but ...
> Actually, I suppose
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> F currently fails on Windows. The reason is that the
> test expects the exit code in the higher byte of the termination
> status.
[ code snippet ]
> The documentation for spawnw (F) says:
> Spawn a subprocess and wait for it to finish. The return statu
Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I add a new target 'setup' in the main Makefile.
> That's allow the creation of a setup-parrot-x.y.z.exe ('standard' binary
> distribution) that contains all parrot install directories and the ICU
> shared libraries.
Shouldn't that better read:
ma
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 23:46 -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
>:
>: In P6, an object is a data-type. It's not a reference, and any member
>: payload is attached directly to the variable.
> Well, it's still a reference, but we try to smudge the distinction in P6.
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A small patch to:
Thanks, applied.
leo
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
Ok, so intsize=4, which is why my md5 test tried to run. I'd be really
grateful if some could run my instrumented MD5.imc from a previous post
on this platform.
So what I'm confused about is why intsize=4 when you say the Parrot core
is 64 bit.
Nick Glencross wrote:
> Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>
>>>Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6
>>>
> Ok, so intsize=4, which is why my md5 test tried to run. I'd be really
> grateful if some could run my instrumented MD5.imc from a previous post
> on th
Jay,
Jay Scherrer wrote:
> Attached is my make test output from my laptop running Fedora Core 3
> x86_64bit: makeTest.txt
> Is there any other way I can help?
>
Thanks for that Jay. What's happened is that in the last week a new test
has gone into CVS, but I haven't had access to systems besides a
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6
True, not true :-) I do manual test compiles in Tru64 once in a while.
Once the packfile portability problems were solved back when, the Parrot
core at least has been pretty good regarding 64
Sven Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am still working on PAPAgei - the PAscal for PArrot
> compiler which is my final year project at I.T.
> Carlow.
Hehe, good name.
> However, I've been struggling with the basic task of
> writing a PRD grammar for quite a while and am about
>
>
> Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6
True, not true :-) I do manual test compiles in Tru64 once in a while.
Once the packfile portability problems were solved back when, the Parrot
core at least has been pretty good regarding 64-bitness.
Tru64 is 64-b
21 matches
Mail list logo
