[perl #28383] [PATCH] Update WHOIS... er, WHOWAS, info

2005-01-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
I find it highly amusing that Warnock's patch to update Warnock's contact information was Warnocked since April of last year. I will put him out of his misery, though. I can only hope that the new email address isn't defunct already. =-) Thanks, applied! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Apr 08 14:02

[perl #32354] [PATCH] update perlhist.txt

2005-01-04 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Thanks, applied. (Note: this patch had already been partially applied.) > [bernhard - Sun Nov 07 05:17:56 2004]: > > Hi, > > this patch updates 'perlhist.txt', which is used as a test case in > 't/library/streams.t'. > 't/library/streams.t' now also uses the new one-line '.return () ' and > '.y

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> What is unclear about: "This just moves the burden of doing a method >> call down to all classes and doesn't really fix anything."? > First you state "The "f" object (the method call stub) has to > shift up call arguments and place t

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/pmc resizablestringarray.t

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry about that - I converted the test from an existing one for > ResizableFloatArray, but forgot that in the string case there's a > much higher load on the GC system due to all the string headers. Actually the problem aren't the string headers per s

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: How should the following be handled: f = "parrot".index The CPython code is: 1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot') 3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index) 6 STORE_NAME

Re: parrot on x86 solaris 2.5.1 (and 2.7)

2005-01-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:29:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please let me know if I'm being too dense or too, er, flippant here, I've No, you seem to be spot on. > The 2.7 doesn't have Sun's cc/CC (too expensive) and so > (config/init/hints/solaris.pl): > my $link = Configure::Data->g

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How should the following be handled: >>f = "parrot".index > The CPython code is: > 1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot') > 3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index) > 6

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/pmc resizablestringarray.t

2005-01-04 Thread Simon Glover
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote: > > > +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values'); > > + new P0, .ResizableStringArray > > + set I0, 0 > > +L1: set S0, I0 > > + set P0[I0], S0 > > + inc

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > How should the following be handled: >f = "parrot".index The CPython code is: 1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 ('parrot') 3 LOAD_ATTR0 (index) 6 STORE_NAME 1 (f

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ramblings on creating a new VTABLE_call_method "slot" to help with implementing Python's bound vs unbound methods: http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/01/03/Bound-Methods 1) Methods are functions, where the first parameter is the object.

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/pmc resizablestringarray.t

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote: >> + lt I0, 10, L1 > ^this^ > really really hurts. It's already reduced in CVS. > Nicholas Clark leo

Re: parrot-0.1.1 make test and nci

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Ian Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pardon me if this is the wrong list for this question. No, you are quite right here. > I'm attempting to build parrot-0.1.1. Parrot is evolving quickly. You might consider to use the CVS version. > t/pmc/nci..NOK 5# Failed test (t/p

Re: Resizable array questions

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) When we resize a Resizable*Array (where * = Integer, Float or String) > by calling set_integer_native, we also set the PMC's active_destroy > flag. However, we don't do this when resizing a ResizablePMCArray > (which also has a different memory allo

Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/pmc resizablestringarray.t

2005-01-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:13:53PM -, Simon Glover wrote: > +output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', 'pop many values'); > + new P0, .ResizableStringArray > + set I0, 0 > +L1: set S0, I0 > + set P0[I0], S0 > + inc I0 > + lt I0, 10, L1 ^this^ re

Re: pop_pad

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Peter Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > Is there a reason that `op pop_pad(out PMC)' has not been > implemented yet? (It's in ops/var.ops). If so, could someone give me a > quick heads up as to that reason. Forgotton? Anyway, it's in. Tests welcome. > Pete leo

Re: [PROPOSAL] VTABLE_call_method

2005-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramblings on creating a new VTABLE_call_method "slot" to help with > implementing Python's bound vs unbound methods: > http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/01/03/Bound-Methods 1) Methods are functions, where the first parameter is the object. We are current