Sam Ruby wrote:
Consider the following code:
def f(x): return len(x)
for i in [0,1]:
print f("foo")
f = lambda x: x.upper()
No, don't. Consider the following code instead:
def f(x): return len(x)
for i in [0,1]:
print f("foo")
len = lambda x: x.upper()
Key differenc
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 7:55 AM -0400 10/18/04, Sam Ruby wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context of
Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
While I posted it on my weblog for for
On Oct-17, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:49 AM -0400 10/17/04, Jacques Mony wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I'm trying to port parrot to the unununium operating system, which
> >uses a modified version of 'diet lib c'. Can anyone tell me if this
> >is actually possible to force the use of this library using
At 7:55 AM -0400 10/18/04, Sam Ruby wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context of
Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
While I posted it on my weblog for formatting and linking re
Sam Ruby wrote:
It seems like everything on that page boils down to: all functions
are module-scoped closures.
A closer translation: "How do I implement module-scoped closures in
Parrot?"
OK, I've roughed out an implementation:
http://intertwingly.net/stories/2004/10/18/scopes.pir
http://intertwin
A
I have started a test script for the Integer PMC. In that process I found
strangeness in get_string(). set_integer_native() can be inherited from the
Scalar PMC.
For the Undef PMC I fixed an error in set_number_native().
A patch is attached. The file t/pmc/integer.t is new.
Applied, though the pa
At 5:56 AM -0700 10/17/04, Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
this patch adds some relevant 'push' ops to the resizable PMCs, described in
pdd_17.
There are also a couple of POD improvements and tests in t/pmc/resizable*.t.
Applied, thanks.
--
Dan
-
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:31:05 -0500 (CDT), Michel Pelletier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The second PIR sequence is longer. It will take
> > IMCC more time to
> > compile that than the first example. As the
> > words become less trivial,
> > this will become more true.
>
> But one can't weigh the
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #32036]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32036 >
I have a little smoke script I threw together that does a cvs checkout, config, make,
> This still doesn't seem right. The compilation
> from Forth to PIR only
> happens once, yes. But each time the defined
> word is used, the PIR
> code, which is injected, must be compiled to
> bytecode.
RIght.
> The second PIR sequence is longer. It will take
> IMCC more time to
> compile that t
At 5:33 AM -0700 10/17/04, Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote:
this patch fixes the --tree option of classes/pmc2s.pl.
Applied, thanks.
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #32035]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32035 >
Hi,
I have started a test script for the Integer PMC. In that process I foun
Sam Ruby wrote:
Unfortunately, these PMCs don't seem to have test cases.
Correction: t/pmc/sub.t
- Sam Ruby
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:17:59 -0500 (CDT), Michel Pelletier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, note that the code I mentioned (the
> speration of core from core words) is not
> checked in right now, but the version in CVS
> does do NCG.
Noted.
> Using the direct threading model, this does 2000
> g
>> I propose you and I work together to make a
>> totally Forth-language agnostic Forth
>> micro-kernel. This kernel can be very
>> minimalistic, a stacik, a machine state hash,
>> and definitions for the words "code", "next",
>> "word", and "'" (tick) all having standard
>> Forth
>> behavior, a
Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 07:55, Sam Ruby wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context
of Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
It seems like everything on that page b
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 07:55, Sam Ruby wrote:
> I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context of
> Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
>
> http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
It seems like everything on that page boils down
All~
This feels similar in spirit to the old framestacks that we used to
have. I throught that we moved away from those to single frame things
so that we did not have to perform special logic around continuations.
I would feel more comfortable if someone explained both the initial
motivation of
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:07:11 -0500 (CDT), Michel Pelletier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my first chance to take a look at it but
> I'm sorry I've nto been able to run it because
> I'm on a different machine. I did look at the
> code though.
Thanks for the feedback. I don't have time to re
This is a summary of a private mail conversation between Leo and myself.
No, it didn't start by me forgetting to fix Reply-To when trying to
post follow-up on the list. ;)
Essentially we whipped up a GC scheme for collecting the register stacks
that doesn't make call/cc-using code, well, unusab
I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context of
Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
While I posted it on my weblog for formatting and linking reasons, feel
free to respond on the mailing
Sorry for the delay...work interfered with my playing and I had to
transfer my CVS repo to my x86-64 machine. I don't know if I'd
classify it as "silence thereafter..." as in the summary, but its pretty
close :)
Here's the diff against the current CVS. It doesn't mess with the
default class tha
22 matches
Mail list logo
