Re: [perl #31446] [BUG] perl Configure failure - gcc

On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 05:12:29 -0700, via RT Leopold Toetsch > [1] or they are here but as e.g. libgdbm.so.3 which the linker seems to > ignore. I ran into this yesterday when trying to configure parrot on my debian box. The (easy) solution was to to install the libgdbm-dev package, which includes l

Re: NCI and callback functions

Well, still about getting callbacks to work on GTK, thaught that before going for this: On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:44:56AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >Otherwise, already thaught of actually unrolling the gtk_main function > >and have it handled/implemented within parrot directly (mainly gtk_

[perl #31447] [PATCH] POD and coding standard in src/nci_test.c

# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #31447] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31447 > Hi, this patch adds a POD section on top of 'src/nci_test.c'. I also tried t

[perl #31446] [BUG] perl Configure failure - gcc

# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #31446] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31446 > $ perl Configure.pl --verbose-step=gcc ... cc -L/usr/local/lib test.o -o test -lg

[perl #31443] [PATCH] Configure.pl check for gcc is out of order.

# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #31443] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31443 > Currently, Configure.pl checks if your compiler is gcc before it determines what co

Re: Semantics for regexes

According to Dan Sugalski: > At 2:44 PM + 9/3/04, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > >According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski): > >>*) extract substring > > > >Rather than that, wouldn't you prefer to make "substring of target > >string" the actual target of all these? > > Only if the resulting sub

Re: Semantics for regexes

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:44:52PM -, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski): > >*) extract substring > > Rather than that, wouldn't you prefer to make "substring of target > string" the actual target of all these? Yes, yes, yes, this would be far more useful.