On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Clayton O'Neill wrote:
> On 2 Sep 2004 15:22:39 -, Andy Dougherty via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure if I understand you correctly, since you don't want c++
> > if Configure.pl chooses gcc. Perhaps you meant icu's configure would find
> > gcc? Or p
At 12:55 PM -0400 9/3/04, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
At 2:44 PM + 9/3/04, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski):
>>*) extract substring
>
>Rather than that, wouldn't you prefer to make "substring of target
>string" the actual target o
At 2:44 PM + 9/3/04, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski):
*) extract substring
Rather than that, wouldn't you prefer to make "substring of target
string" the actual target of all these?
Only if the resulting substring'd be used in the match. Otherwise
you're be
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski):
>*) extract substring
Rather than that, wouldn't you prefer to make "substring of target
string" the actual target of all these?
>*) exact string compare
>*) find string in string
>*) find first character of class X in string
>*) find first character
[ resent ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:17:52 +0200
Subject: Integer PMCs
Fog around integer PMC semantics is lifting, so we should start bringing
classes/*.pmc into shape.
Currently PerlInt is the most complete implementation of the proposed
semantics. Some vtable methods like C still need work, t
The BigInt PMC has a lot of unimplemented MMD and vtable functions. Some
are denoted with internal_exception ... "unimp", some are probably just
missing.
So it'll be great if some folks could complete that.
A second job what be to take a start at an internal implemenation of the
BigInt / BigNum
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:16 PM +0200 8/31/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>>Pclass = getclass, "Foo"
>>Pobjnew = Pclass."__new"(args) # Pnew is an OUT argument
>>
>>and that be special-cased to call VTABLE_new according to calling
>>conventions.
> Still don't like __n
The C opcode and vtable is in CVS. The Complex PMC has a
reference implementation (modulo some error checking[1]) and there are
some tests using the new opcode as well as the function call syntax.
I'd be glad if people could implement the C vtable method
for other PMCs too.
Some PMCs have a si
