Hi,
On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:09, Will Coleda wrote:
> I am having trouble running a .pbc that includes a call to _dumper
> unless I run it from the top level parrot directory.
>
> bash-2.05a$ cat ./foo.imc
> .sub main
>_dumper($P1)
>end
> .end
>
> .include "library/dumper.imc"
> bash-2
I am having trouble running a .pbc that includes a call to _dumper
unless I run it from the top level parrot directory.
bash-2.05a$ cat ./foo.imc
.sub main
_dumper($P1)
end
.end
.include "library/dumper.imc"
bash-2.05a$ ./parrot -o foo.pbc foo.imc
bash-2.05a$ ./parrot foo.pbc
"VAR1" => null
b
Hello all,
I've been investigating the possibility of creating a MACHINE
DESCRIPTION (aka BACK-END) for GCC to target PARROT. My thinking is
this: If a satisfactory GCC back-end targeting PARROT is created -and-
PARROT is efficient enough (which from reading the documentation thus
far produced
Here are recent numbers with the new method cache:
$ perl tools/dev/parrotbench.pl -c=parrotbench.conf -b=^oo
Numbers are relative to the first one. (lower is better)
parrotj parrot parrotC perl-th perlpython ruby
oo1 100%104%106%98% 83% 54% 70%
oo2 10
Larry Wall wrote:
Well, Leo asked for hints, and I basically said Perl has no problem
sending them. If Parrot has a problem receiving them, that's another
matter. :-)
When there are now hits from languages like Ruby or Smalltalk, then one
single flag will do it: If ever a real Continuation is cr
At 08:57 AM 3/19/2004 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:38 PM +0100 3/18/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>>Which brings up again my warnocked question: How can return
>>continuations get reused?
> Works like this. (No pasm, but it should be obvious)
I was a
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 11:18:08AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: At 12:44 PM -0800 3/19/04, Larry Wall wrote:
: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:57:28AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: >: What's the usage of Continuations from HLLs point of view? Can we get
: >: some hints, what is intended?
: >
: >From
At 12:44 PM -0800 3/19/04, Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:57:28AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: What's the usage of Continuations from HLLs point of view? Can we get
: some hints, what is intended?
From the standpoint of Perl 6, I hope to hide continuations far, far
away in a galaxy
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I argue that we have the problems we do (incorrect behaviour of
> continuations, horrible allocation performance) because we chose the
> wrong optimization in the first place. The stack optimizations that are
> in place make sense when you don't have conti
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:57:28AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>>: I'd like to have, if possible a clear indication: that's a plain
>>: function or method call and this is not. I think the possible speedup i
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another f'up WRT Continuations. Here is an example how to setup a
Continuation:
# main.imc
.sub _main
load_bytecode "set_a.imc"
print "main\n"
end
.end
# set_a.imc
.sub _set_a @LOAD
.local pmc cont
print "set_a\n"
newsub .Sub,
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to implement a Parrot port of xUnit so we can write
> tests natively in parrot and things were going reasonably well until I
> reached the point where I needed to do exception handling.
> Exception handling hurt my head, badly, so eventual
12 matches
Mail list logo
