Re: [NEW] library/sdl.imc

2004-02-18 Thread chromatic
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote: > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library. > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most important > SDL functions directly available in PIR code. Overall this looks good. I am not sure if it is better

Re: [PATCH] library/sdl_types.imc #2

2004-02-18 Thread chromatic
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:21, Jens Rieks wrote: > This patch fixes _SDL_WaitEvent a bit; SDL_WaitEvent returns an integer and > not a SDL_Event. > It also introduces _SDL_PollEvent which is mostly a copy of _SDL_WaitEvent. > Finally, _SDL_loop is modified to allow an "idle" event entry that gets c

Re: Objects: Now or forever (well, for a while) hold your peace

2004-02-18 Thread Simon Glover
One really pedantic comment: wouldn't it make sense to rename the fetchmethod op to fetchmeth, for consistency with callmeth, tailcallmeth etc? Simon

[PATCH] Re: [perl #25239] Platform-specific files not granular enough

2004-02-18 Thread Adam Thomason
Hopefully in time to make the feature freeze, here's an effort at solving this problem. I went through the platform .c and .h files and broke out the redundant bits into the following "modules", which were already delimited by comments in generic.*: dl: dynamic library loading e

Re: Objects: Now or forever (well, for a while) hold your peace

2004-02-18 Thread Michal Wallace
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Just to let everyone know, if there aren't any comments on the scheme > in PDD 15, I'm going to implement it as-is and be done with it, at > least for now. This would be a good time to speak up--can't guarantee > that I'll put the changes in for this rev,

Objects: Now or forever (well, for a while) hold your peace

2004-02-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
Just to let everyone know, if there aren't any comments on the scheme in PDD 15, I'm going to implement it as-is and be done with it, at least for now. This would be a good time to speak up--can't guarantee that I'll put the changes in for this rev, but I certainly can't think about it if I don