> I've added the Perl modules for the docs tools to lib/Parrot/IO and
> lib/Parrot/Docs. I've also added Pod-Simple (2.05) and Pod-Escapes
> (1.03) which they use.
I probably blinked.. but why are we including CPAN modules that we are
not likely to change into the parrot repository?
-R
I've added the Perl modules for the docs tools to lib/Parrot/IO and
lib/Parrot/Docs. I've also added Pod-Simple (2.05) and Pod-Escapes
(1.03) which they use.
Running
perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl
should build the html tree in docs/html. I'd be interested to know of
any problems encountered.
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error 1 years
Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recentl
> "c" == chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
c> I ran this program in lieu of the debugger:
i recall an old trick i learned to get offsets into structs which would
be easier to read than hex addresses:
c> int main ()
c> {
c> SDL_KeyboardEvent kbevent;
c> printf( "0x%08X
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:36, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > As I understand it (and correct me if I'm wrong), SDL_keysym needs a
> > byte of padding on my architecture within SDL_KeyboardEvent.
> Brr. I don't know. I've to ask my debugger for that :) If you have
> SDL_keysym alone, that needs 3 bytes
This ...
.include "errors.pasm"
errorsoff .PARROT_ERRORS_GLOBALS_FLAG
find_global P1, "no_such_global"
defined I0, P1
... allows working around current exception handler (COW) bug and is
more perlish then the default pie-thonish behavior, which is: just throw
an exception
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, it doesn't, as the struct I'm emulating is:
> typedef struct {
> Uint8 type; /* SDL_KEYDOWN or SDL_KEYUP */
> Uint8 which;/* The keyboard device index */
> Uint8 state;/* SDL_PRESSED or SD
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> >1 years
> >
> > Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
>
> How recently did you check? I
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 00:52, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Pushing zero as offset should do The Right Thing, that is proper
> aligning the item. Tighter packed structures can be achieved with
> explicit offset parameters.
In this case, it doesn't, as the struct I'm emulating is:
typedef struc
Sterling Hughes writes:
> Hey,
>
> The following PIR crashes CVS head:
>
> .sub _main
> $P0 = new PerlUndef
> .sym PerlUndef i
> i = new PerlUndef
> i = 0
> L0:
> $I0 = 0
> $P1 = new PerlUndef
> $P1 = 10
> unless i < $P1 goto L3
>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:30:44AM -0500, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> >Whether it should actually be in the language is up for debate. I'd say
> >that if you need to do this with any frequency whatsoever, you're not
> >thinking about roles right. A good example might be in order... :-)
>
> Well, what i
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> 1 years
>
> Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recently did you check? I committed a reimplementation of perl6
regexes abou
Hey,
The following PIR crashes CVS head:
.sub _main
$P0 = new PerlUndef
.sym PerlUndef i
i = new PerlUndef
i = 0
L0:
$I0 = 0
$P1 = new PerlUndef
$P1 = 10
unless i < $P1 goto L3
$I0 = 1
L3:
if $I0 goto L1
goto
Leopold Toetsch writes:
> I'd add some syntax additions and some notes:
>
> - Pn above is a NameSpace PMC, derived from Hash
> - an interpreter has a current namespace
> - located in the context, so that its restored after sub calls
>
>getinterp P2
>find_global Pn, P2["."] # get current
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, here's a quick scoop and status.
> *) I'd like to shoot for a Feb 14th release. Names wanted. (I'm
> partial to the bleeding heart release, but not that partial)
I had planned towards Feb 29th. A nice dated too this year.
> *) Namespaces are going
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch make the problem case submitted by Jeff Clites work. All
> tests pass, and his sample has been added to the tests.
> struct RegisterChunkBuf* top = stack->top;
> if (top->used > 1) {
> +top->used--;
Thanks for the patch *but*
Joseph Ryan writes:
> >It's surely possible by modifying that class's DISPATCH.
> >
> >Whether it should actually be in the language is up for debate. I'd say
> >that if you need to do this with any frequency whatsoever, you're not
> >thinking about roles right. A good example might be in order
Hi,
I would like to add Parrot as a scripting engine for a software project.
Embedding it is no problem, but I was wondering if the current
implementation supports the embedder to provide functions to the Parrot
bytecode applications? The idea is that I would like to access C
functions the embedde
# New Ticket Created by Matt Fowles
# Please include the string: [perl #25960]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=25960 >
All~
This patch make the problem case submitted by Jeff Clites work. All
tests pass
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:27:31PM +, Harry Jackson wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >*) I'll try and patch up the docs, and I'll concentrate on the PDDs, but
> >any help on them is greatly appreciated. *Especially* IMCC docs.
>
> Do we need an NCI section in the IMCC.faq. If the vote is ye
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the following code trips up IMCC's temp lifetime tracing:
Fix committed.
leo
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> set layout['member'], .DATATYPE_INT
> push layout, 0
> push layout, 0
Pushing zero as offset should do The Right Thing, that is proper
aligning the item. Tighter packed structures can be achieved with
explicit offset parameters.
Its basical
22 matches
Mail list logo
