On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 11:55 , Melvin Smith wrote:
At 11:45 PM 1/28/2004 -0500, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, at 12:53 , Melvin Smith wrote:
At 12:27 PM 1/23/2004 -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
Java Collections are a standard Java library of common data
structur
On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 09:12 , Matt Fowles wrote:
I have been getting out of order messages from this list for months...
I just assumed that the internet was a mysterious thing...
Methinks the list is also manually moderated
—
Gordon Henriksen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ another TOFU [1] ]
AOL
leo
> Mike~
> You rock. That is really nice.
> Matt
> Michael Scott wrote:
>> I've add inline docs to everything in src (except for malloc.c and
>> malloc-trace.c).
>>
>> At times I wondered whether this was the right thing to
I have been getting out of order messages from this list for months...
I just assumed that the internet was a mysterious thing...
Matt
Will Coleda wrote:
On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 01:51 PM, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Will Coleda) writes:
What's going on with the ordering
On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 01:51 PM, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Will Coleda) writes:
What's going on with the ordering of messages? My message of : Tue,
27 Jan 2004 19:53:15 -0500 just made it to the list, a day after my
(also delayed) /followup/ to that message. And Leo, who
Jeff Clites writes:
> We could certainly do some sort of language-specific prefixing, as Tim
> suggested, but it seems that we are then going to trouble to unify,
> only to immediately de-unify. Certainly, a random Java programmer
> shouldn't have to worry about naming a class so that it doesn't
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought we were discussing correct behavior of a shared data structure,
> not general cases. Or maybe this is the general case and I should
> go read more backlog? :)
Basically we have three kinds of locking:
- HLL user level locking [1]
- user level lo
Elizabeth Mattijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:40 +0100 1/28/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>$ time parrot shared_ref.pasm
>>
>>real0m0.375s
> Ah.. I want a Ponie! ;-)
Actually some bits are still missing:
- The SharedRef construction code has to ensure that the refered PMC is
share
Mike~
You rock. That is really nice.
Matt
Michael Scott wrote:
I've add inline docs to everything in src (except for malloc.c and
malloc-trace.c).
At times I wondered whether this was the right thing to do. For example,
in mmd.c, where Dan had already created a mmd.pod, I ended up
duplicati
On Jan 27, 2004, at 3:47 PM, Cory Spencer wrote:
Perhaps someone with a bit more familiarity with the Parrot IO
subsystem
could give me some guidance here. I'm currently trying to get a new
'peek' opcode working, and I'm having difficulties getting the io_unix
layer implemented correctly.
As fa
Simon Cozens wrote:
I think the mail servers for cpan.org/perl.org are having to shift
rather a lot of mail at the moment, for some reason.
For those that are unaware there is currently a rather serious virus in
the wild at the moment and a lot of mailing lists are being afffected. I
think its ca
At 11:45 PM 1/28/2004 -0500, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, at 12:53 , Melvin Smith wrote:
At 12:27 PM 1/23/2004 -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
Java Collections are a standard Java library of common data structures
such as arrays and hashes. Collections are not synchronized;
On Jan 28, 2004, at 6:42 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:00:53 -0800, Jeff Clites wrote:
I think we shouldn't try to do any sort of cross-language unification.
That is, if we some day have a Parrot version of Java, and in Perl6
code I
want to reference a global created inside of s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Will Coleda) writes:
> What's going on with the ordering of messages? My message of : Tue, 27 Jan 2004
> 19:53:15 -0500 just made it to the list, a day after my (also delayed) /followup/ to
> that message. And Leo, who responded to the most recent, had his email make it to
> t
What's going on with the ordering of messages? My message of : Tue, 27 Jan 2004
19:53:15 -0500 just made it to the list, a day after my (also delayed) /followup/ to
that message. And Leo, who responded to the most recent, had his email make it to the
list before either of these. =-)
Regards.
I've add inline docs to everything in src (except for malloc.c and
malloc-trace.c).
At times I wondered whether this was the right thing to do. For
example, in mmd.c, where Dan had already created a mmd.pod, I ended up
duplicating information. At other times I reckoned that what was needed
was
Hi,
I'll look into what's involved with upgrading. I'm not sure if I'll
elect to do it or not. It's probably the one major upgrade to a linux
system that I've never done so I'd like to do it as a learning
experience. At the same time, I've heard it can be painful. And
downloading anything with
We have some places in code, where we have to cleanup, if an internal
exception was thrown, e.g. after LOCK()ing a mutex or in
classes/delegate.pmc to free the saved memory structure.
Attached is a test program with some macros allowing code like:
TRY {
some();
}
CATCH {
clean_up(
Sorry about the delay in responding.
My current sample program is 2760 lines of imcc in 23 files, plus a
small .tcl script.
I'll see if I can trim that down to a more reasonable test case.
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 05:32 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:53:09PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 12:27 PM 1/23/2004 -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
> >Java Collections are a standard Java library of common data structures
> >such as arrays and hashes. Collections are not synchronized; access
> >involves no locks at all. Multiple th
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, at 12:53 , Melvin Smith wrote:
At 12:27 PM 1/23/2004 -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
Java Collections are a standard Java library of common data structures
such as arrays and hashes. Collections are not synchronized; access
involves no locks at all. Multiple threads
21 matches
Mail list logo
