# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #24683]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24683 >
This patch updates the following operators and their assignment
counterparts:
_ be
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:54:27PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:00 AM + 1/1/04, Allison Randal (via RT) wrote:
> ># New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
> ># Please include the string: [perl #24682]
> ># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> ># http://rt.p
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:54:25 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 11:38 PM + 12/16/03, Pete Lomax wrote:
>>Hi,
>>I've hit a very strange problem:
>>
>> set N18, 86
>> save N18
>> restore N18
Solved. I forgot I was using -O2 when executing via CreateProcessA,
which
At 12:00 AM + 1/1/04, Allison Randal (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #24682]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24682 >
I can't compile parrot on Mac
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #24682]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24682 >
I can't compile parrot on Mac OS 10.3.1 tonight. It's been about a week
since I las
At 11:38 PM + 12/16/03, Pete Lomax wrote:
Hi,
I've hit a very strange problem:
set N18, 86
save N18
restore N18
if I run this from a DOS prompt, it works fine, however if I run it
via the kernel32.dll function CreateProcessA, the restore N18 line
fails with "Wrong type o
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley writes:
>> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> This should, of course, read:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Or even:
>
> http://groups.google.c
Hi,
I've hit a very strange problem:
set N18, 86
save N18
restore N18
if I run this from a DOS prompt, it works fine, however if I run it
via the kernel32.dll function CreateProcessA, the restore N18 line
fails with "Wrong type on top of stack!".
If I change the first lin
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 6:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Namespaces, part 2
>
> load_global $P1, ['foo'; 'bar'] '$baz'
> load_global $P2, ['foo'; 'bar'] '$xyzzy'
I'm not at all familiar with the intricacies of Parrot inter
At 11:56 AM +0100 12/12/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Yet another keyed ops proposal[1]
Given the Perl6 expression:
@a[$i] = @b[1] + $k;
This should translate to
add P0[I0], P1[1], I2
But having multi-keyed variants of all relevant opcodes would burst
our opcode count to #of-keyed-opcodes * #
I lost track of this a bit (sorry, work intruded) so lets pick it
back up again.
As we last left it, I'd proposed we access namespaces via a
multidimensional key to dodge the whole "What separator does *this*
language use?" problem. I'd also proposed that we split the namespace
and thing name
At 9:52 AM +0100 12/16/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If, as part if a prototyped .pcc_begin/.pcc_end function call set,
you try and set an integer parameter equal to the register number the
integer would go into.
.pcc_begin prototyped
.arg 1
# New Ticket Created by "Jose S. Plummer"
# Please include the string: [perl #24677]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24677 >
Piers Cawley writes:
> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Vocabulary
> > If you're even vaguely interested in the workings of Perl 6's object
> > system, you need to read the referenced post.
> >
> > Luke Palmer, worrying about people using Object related vocabulary
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vocabulary
> If you're even vaguely interested in the workings of Perl 6's object
> system, you need to read the referenced post.
>
> Luke Palmer, worrying about people using Object related vocabulary in
> subtly inconsistent way
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20031214
It looks like things are starting to slow down slightly as we run up to
Christmas, but the quality of discussion remains high. We'll start with
the usual trawl through perl6-internals.
Testing for null
Dan ruled on last week's discu
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If, as part if a prototyped .pcc_begin/.pcc_end function call set,
> you try and set an integer parameter equal to the register number the
> integer would go into.
> .pcc_begin prototyped
> .arg 1
> .arg 6
> .arg 7
A simple test case work
17 matches
Mail list logo
