Jos Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would therefore vote that we keep these opcodes as verbose as
> possible. So no eq/eql/equal, but rather
> same_address/same_content/compare/compare_as_num/compare_as_string.
Or as verbose as needed [1]:
ident, eq, , _num, _string for in (lt le gt ge)
> We're already using 'eq' to perform equality testing, and in the interests
> of maintaining a consistent design I would choose to stick with something
> eq-related as opposed to changing it to 'same'.
>
> eqaddr/eqval? eq_addr/eq_val? eq_address/eq_value?
Oops, correction there - I'd forgotte
> I think this is definitely something we should do if we want to confuse
> people as much as possible :-)
This is likely true, seeing as I *still* have troubles keeping the various
Lisp eq/eql/equal/equalp's straight. ;)
> I would therefore vote that we keep these opcodes as verbose as
> possib
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:27:45AM -0700 it came to pass that Cory Spencer wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > >
> > > > Op vtable Meaning
> > > > - is_same PMCs are ident
> > > > - is_equal PMCs are equivalent, holding the same value
> > > > Y cmp
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> > > Op vtable Meaning
> > > - is_same PMCs are ident
> > > - is_equal PMCs are equivalent, holding the same value
> > > Y cmp cmp PMCs
> > > - cmp_num cmp PMCs numerically
> > > - cmp_string cmp PMCs as strin
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Cory Spencer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > Op vtable Meaning
> > - is_same PMCs are ident
> > - is_equal PMCs are equivalent, holding the same value
> > Y cmp cmp PMCs
> > - cmp_num cmp PMCs numerically
> > - cm
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Op vtable Meaning
> - is_same PMCs are ident
> - is_equal PMCs are equivalent, holding the same value
> Y cmp cmp PMCs
> - cmp_num cmp PMCs numerically
> - cmp_string cmp PMCs as strings
>
> Proposals for opcode nam
Can someone add a pause to parrot, presumably similar to the existing
-. option, only at the end, if an error occurs.
Pete
Ibotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> i am interested, if there is a method (for a PMC), that is automagically
>>> called, whenever a called method is not existent.
>>
>> If you are speaking of vtable->method, yes - the method in default.pmc
>> is called.
> can a pmc override this method?
There i
>> i am interested, if there is a method (for a PMC), that is automagically
>> called, whenever a called method is not existent.
>
> If you are speaking of vtable->method, yes - the method in default.pmc
> is called.
can a pmc override this method?
> If you are speaking of objects, there will be
Ibotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am interested, if there is a method (for a PMC), that is automagically
> called, whenever a called method is not existent.
If you are speaking of vtable->method, yes - the method in default.pmc
is called.
If you are speaking of objects, there will be such a fe
As outlined some time ago, when ops.num made it into the core, we need
fix assigned PMC class enums too. (Changed class enums invalidate
existing PBC files).
1) lib/Parrot/PMC.pm is the canonical source of PMC class => enum mapping.
2) the class enums should be numbered so that "base" classes co
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way in PASM to determine whether or not two PMC's share the
> same memory address?
Not yet. We have the vtable methods but the opcodes are missing.
We have:
Op vtable Meaning
- is_same PMCs are ident
- is_equal PMCs are equ
13 matches
Mail list logo
