The Perl 6 Summary of the week ending 20031102
It's Monday morning, the croissants have been baked, the focaccia is
glistening with all the extra virgin olive oil I poured on it as it left
the oven and, in the airing cupboard, a raisin borodinsky slouches
towards full proof (thought
# New Ticket Created by "Microsoft Network System"
# Please include the string: [perl #24400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24400 >
file attachment: gerb.exe
This e-mail in its original form contained one
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Nick Kostirya wrote:
> >
> > > Catalog docs\ops is empty in 0.0.13 version.
> > > Is it bug?
> >
> > I think that's leftover cruft.
>
> Well, we used to generate a .pod file for each .
I've been playing with an "uncommitted" op version of invoke
that takes a method or sub by name like below:
invoke "foo", 0
The 0 is irrelevant to the eye, but it is a placeholder for the self-modifying
instruction. Upon call, invoke by name does:
op invoke(STR, INT)
PMC sub
if($2 == 0) {
sub =
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Nick Kostirya wrote:
>
> > Catalog docs\ops is empty in 0.0.13 version.
> > Is it bug?
>
> I think that's leftover cruft.
Well, we used to generate a .pod file for each .ops file, at build time,
which lived in here. However, we do
"Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch makes it an optional part of the normal build
> system. By using the switch --buildicu the ./configure of icu/source
> is run and the makefile is extended with rules for building and
> cleaning icu. This option is not ena
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Nick Kostirya wrote:
> Hello.
> I have several questions about parrot dosc.
>
> I have noticed that docs\parrot_assembly.pod is old version of
> \docs\pdds\pdd06_pasm.pod file.
> Will these files be distinguished in the future?
And they're both wrong, unfortunately. :( pdd06
Hello.
I have several questions about parrot dosc.
I have noticed that docs\parrot_assembly.pod is old version of
\docs\pdds\pdd06_pasm.pod file.
Will these files be distinguished in the future?
Catalog docs\ops is empty in 0.0.13 version.
Is it bug?
Nick.
applied thanks.
/s
thanks, applied.
/s
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #24396]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24396 >
...
t\src\io..NOK 9# Failed test (t\src\io.t at line 242)
# go
In an attempt to understand what the plan is with regard to ICU and
Parrot strings in general, I've been gathering together links to
previous bits of discussion on:
http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/
ParrotDistributionUnicodeSupport
Obviously what is still needed is
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #24392]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24392 >
This patch changes the test instead of the code. The code is actually
correct. (We dec
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #24391]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24391 >
Several tests in t/compiler/call.t were failing with the error:
set_integer_native(
Whilst attempting to implement DBCS encoding, I have discovered that
skip_backward cannot be implemented for this encoding style, due to the
mixture of 1-byte and 2-byte characters.
Some of the available options:
1) Throw an exception if somebody tries to skip_backward in a DBCS
string
2) Stan
15 matches
Mail list logo
