Steve Fink:
# On Sep-15, Brent Dax wrote:
# > Steve Fink:
# > # 2. typedef struct Parrot_Interp stuff. Brent, you're the man -- do
you
# > # still need some agreement on conventions before you rename our
world?
# >
# > You mean we might actually (gasp!) get this done? Horrors!
#
# Huh? No, I just
(Moving to internals. Definitely not a language discussion.)
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Sorry if this is a crack fuelled idea, and sorry that I don't
> have a patch handy to implement it, but might the following
> work:
With the same caveats (coke, no diff), try this strategy on for size:
The
> * e.g. add_n_i_n => add_n_n_i
> * div_n_ic_n => div_n_nc_n
> * div_n_i_n => set_n_i ; div_n_n_n
> + * ge_n_ic_ic => ge_nc_ic
-+-+
| |
| |
_|_
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #23815]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23815 >
This fixes an apparent obvious typo in the Jako Makefile. I also put in
the cd-back-to
> Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
> 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
Brent isn't adult? Gosh!
BRENT_D = 36/2.04739336492890995260663507109 = appr. 17 ages and 296 days
On Sep-15, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure how to use the current pdd03's calling conventions to
> > implement what I want right now. Let's consider Perl6:
>
> First, that whole stuff definitely needs more clarification. Calling and
> return conventi
On Sep-15, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> Moreover, Steve Fink's comment just below the line you propose deleting
> leads me to believe there's something more to it, but I don't actually
> know what the issue was.
>
> > *** String.pm.~1.6.~Sun Mar 16 01:02:08 2003
> > --- String.pm Mon Se
Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
>
>> Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
>> 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
>
> They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond?
> Impressive.
I don't. But I do kno
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ the *big* move around ]
>
> > Anything I'm missing? This is for *after* 0.0.11, of course. (And
> > potentially after a case of really good beer, soda, or dog food is shipped
> > off to Robert... :)
>
>
Michael Scott (via RT) wrote:
Makefile:600: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8
spaces?). Stop.
This is already fixed.
Thanks,
leo
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ the *big* move around ]
> Anything I'm missing? This is for *after* 0.0.11, of course. (And
> potentially after a case of really good beer, soda, or dog food is shipped
> off to Robert... :)
I like that. What about subsystems (io, encodings, chartypes, p
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and a very very recent perl-5.8.x, I'm
> getting several failures in perl6/languages/t/compiler/1.t. Here's a
> typical sample. Note that the difference is simply in whether or not to
> include the trailing zeros in t
On Solaris 8, with Sun's compiler and a very very recent perl-5.8.x, I'm
getting several failures in perl6/languages/t/compiler/1.t. Here's a
typical sample. Note that the difference is simply in whether or not to
include the trailing zeros in the print command. Does anyone know which
is "right"
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> > This problem's been around a while -- I know I've reported it before. Is
> > it time to give up on 5.00503? I will retest with 5.8.x, but the
> > compilation takes a *long* time.
>
> I'm not personally a fan of 5.005 compatibility, but it looks to me
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > I suppose that was a question for the language list. But then I'd
have
> > to read the language list.
>
> A fate worse than razor burn, to be sure. Possibly one worse than
really
> bad Mexican food, but either way I'd not wish i
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Steve Fink wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose that was a question for the language list. But then I'd
> have
> > > to read the language list.
> >
> > A fate worse than razor burn, to be sure. Possibly one wors
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the problem is actually a dependency on a module not shipped with
> perl5.00503.
>
> This problem's been around a while -- I know I've reported it before. Is
> it time to give up on 5.00503? I will retest with 5.8.x, but the
> compilation takes a *l
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
> 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond?
Impressive.
Simon
On Solaris 8, with Sun's supplied perl5.00503 and with Sun's cc, I get the
following error when trying to build perl6:
cd perl6 && make test && cd ..
/usr/bin/perl t/harness
t/builtins/array# Failed test (t/builtins/array.t at line 27)
# got: 'error:imcc:parse error, unexpected EO
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
-Melvin
"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/15/2003 11:43 AM
To: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: This
On Solaris 8, with Sun's supplied perl5.00503 and with Sun's cc, I get the
following error when trying to build jako:
cd jako && make && cd ..
/usr/bin/perl -I lib jakoc examples/bench.jako > examples/bench.imc ||
(rm -f examples/bench.imc && false)
Can't modify subroutine entry in scalar assi
Poor guy, I just told him the same thing off-list. Well I come to think of
it,
I guess that makes me an old fogey too.
-Melvin
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/15/2003 11:39 AM
To: Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAI
Dan Sugalski:
# On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
# > Piers Cawley:
# > # Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way
could
# > there
# > # be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by
reading
# > # through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing li
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
> Piers Cawley:
> # Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could
> there
> # be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
> # through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists and
> # boiling t
Piers Cawley:
# Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could
there
# be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
# through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists and
# boiling them down into a summary?
Happy birthday, Piers. E
Okay, since we're fighting over what goes where in the tree, we might as
well do it right. Leo wants IMCC put in a separate subdirectory, and I
can't much disagree, except that none of the rest of the core engine code
is in a separate subdirectory.
Since we've been threatening for years (litera
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Steve Fink wrote:
> Time to clean up! How are Windows builds doing these days? Looking at
> the tinderbox, it looks like we've got a Debian PPC, a FreeBSD, and an
> x86 Linux, but nothing "interesting". And all broken by some jerk who
> didn't update the MANIFEST.
I'll kick g
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Steve Fink wrote:
> I'm not sure how to use the current pdd03's calling conventions to
> implement what I want right now. Let's consider Perl6:
>
> sub f ($a, $b) { ... }
> f(1, 2);
> &f(1, 2);
>
> (I'm not sure if that is correct Perl6 code -- what I mean is that I
>
# New Ticket Created by Michael Scott
# Please include the string: [perl #23809]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23809 >
I seem to be specializing in minimalist patches.
Building the latest checkout from CVS
> 4. Win32. I don't know that it's broken, but I'm assuming it is on
> general principle.
D:\build\parrot>perl Configure.pl
[snip]
Probing for C headers...done.
Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at
lib/Parrot/Configure/St
ep.pm line 170.
The code
# 'link' needs to be link
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030914
Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could there
be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists and
boiling them down into a summary?
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Leo: the seg fault seems bad,
> + LOCALS => '.local PerlInt a',
adding "a = new PerlInt" here fixed the segfault, the test runs
fine.
leo
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. languages/imcc move. Last I heard, this was blocked on Dan & Leo
> coming to an agreement over where it, and the rest of the source code,
> should go.
Robert said:
"We should probably wait until after 0.0.11 for this, to minimize
disruption."
I'm fine wi
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure how to use the current pdd03's calling conventions to
> implement what I want right now. Let's consider Perl6:
First, that whole stuff definitely needs more clarification. Calling and
return conventions are not symmetrical, C (number of items in
A couple of other things came to mind. Here's my current view of the
laundry list. Additions welcome.
1. languages/imcc move. Last I heard, this was blocked on Dan & Leo
coming to an agreement over where it, and the rest of the source code,
should go.
2. typedef struct Parrot_Interp stuff. Bre
35 matches
Mail list logo
