Luke Palmer:
# Is there a problem with providing a mechanism which would suspend all
# threads except for the "current" one, as to ensure that the serialize
# operates, er, serially. Could it be implemented with a top-priority
# event post that acquires a global lock?
What about the thread that d
Oops. Well, I said I, didn't I? Doesn't mutt know what I
mean!? %-)
Luke
Luke Palmer writes:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> You wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to include pdump and disassemble in POW, and they seem not to be
> > compiled by a normal Configure/make. So, I went to compile them, and while
Hi Jonathan,
You wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to include pdump and disassemble in POW, and they seem not to be
> compiled by a normal Configure/make. So, I went to compile them, and while
> I can get pdump.obj and disassemble.obj, I'm having trouble linking them.
>
> Please could somebody put me out
Gordon Henriksen writes:
(B> What you're suggesting also has significant side-effects: It halts
(B> hypothetical multithreaded programs, suspends DoD, prevents the
(B> traversal mechanism from calling back into parrot code, requires
(B> fine-grained locks which are extremely expensive and have
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snipped a lot of explanations ]
Please keep in mind, that the intended usage inside Parrot just should
be to locate some standard include or extension files for Parrot
internals. More abstraction and complexity can always be ad
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Note that a seen hash isn't particularly threadsafe here, at least not
> in any useful way, since we have to make sure the structure we're
> traversing doesn't change during traversal or any threadsafety we put
> in is useless since we're potentially dumping corrupt data.
So
Hi,
I want to include pdump and disassemble in POW, and they seem not to be
compiled by a normal Configure/make. So, I went to compile them, and while
I can get pdump.obj and disassemble.obj, I'm having trouble linking them.
Please could somebody put me out of my misery and tell me what I need t
Joseph Ryan writes:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>So, I know how to use find_method to get a method from an object;
> >>but is there any way to dynamically add a method to a class?
> >>Basically, I want to do something like this:
> >>
> >> ne
Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Joseph Ryan wrote:
So, I know how to use find_method to get a method from an object;
but is there any way to dynamically add a method to a class?
Basically, I want to do something like this:
newclass P2, "Foo"
new P1, P2
addr I0, _Foo::some
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 01:39 America/Los_Angeles, Arthur Bergman
wrote:
What Robert said Whatever you need to get the job done. :-)
We'll keep the (abandoned) SVN repository around so you can try it
again every few months. Hopefully it'll get usable for you at some
point. (As Rob
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, for a perl/python/ruby object of class Foo, to add a new method
> > you'd just add a new sub/method name/PMC binding to the Foo namespace.
>
> Can I translate that to: "some_method" in class "Foo"
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, for a perl/python/ruby object of class Foo, to add a new method
> you'd just add a new sub/method name/PMC binding to the Foo namespace.
Can I translate that to: "some_method" in class "Foo" has a Sub PMC in
the global stash, i.e. is retrievable b
> take a whole work day, and so on). That together with questiones raised
> by several other developers I think it is time to abandon subversion
> and go to CVS.
We're not going to twist your arms.. although we are pretty happy with
SVN for our use for web stuff. (And in some ways, it's easier
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As I was googling to see how other people have approached
> > these problems I ran across:
>
> > http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/cbrumme/CategoryView.aspx/CLR
>
> What did you find there, besides a description that a certain
>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> So, I know how to use find_method to get a method from an object;
> but is there any way to dynamically add a method to a class?
> Basically, I want to do something like this:
>
> newclass P2, "Foo"
> new P1, P2
>
> addr I0, _Foo::somemet
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Uri Guttman wrote:
> IMO the simplest solution is a global
> mutex when doing any scans through the pmcs.
For the lock to be useful any and all mutators would have to aquire it, as
well as anyone reading the shared variables, since we need to keep anyone
from changing the in
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> What's a dump stream actually going to look like? E.g.,
> Fine and good. But dump must handle object graphs, which can be
> recursive or self-referential or whatnot:
>
> $a = { b => undef };
> $b = { a => $a};
> $a->{b} = $b;
> pr
Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> I get the following error when I try to parrot -o basic.pbc
> merged_basic.pasm (in parrot 0.0.10 on Win32):
[ missing commas ]
> I also got an error from the "puts" function on line 120 of alpha.pasm.
> I don't know what puts means, but changing it
Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I was googling to see how other people have approached these problems I
> ran across:
> http://blogs.gotdotnet.com/cbrumme/CategoryView.aspx/CLR
What did you find there, besides a description that a certain company
is producing b0rken software ;-)
Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so i don't see any major downside to a global mutex vs the nastiness of
> deadlocks and handling them. the mutex means no difficult coding issues
> and it can handle all the different (i agree with dan and vote for one
> common scan iterator) possible scan
Gordon Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Panic! Dump needs to refer to line 4 again, or else recurse! How?
Don't Panic! Here is the point, where either next_for_GC is used or the
seen hash. The former is/was used to mark (visit) PMCs. If they have
been visited, they have that pointer set els
Ok, this thread has now +45 entries, I'll try to summarize the
proposed PMC traversal schemes.
0) As the subject still applies ;-) we want to be able to dump() or
pretty_print() a PMC (and possibly aggregate members of that). This
turns out to be a special case of a deep traversal over nested PMCs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ snipped a lot of explanations ]
Please keep in mind, that the intended usage inside Parrot just should
be to locate some standard include or extension files for Parrot
internals. More abstraction and complexity can always be added above
that or imple
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> You also must worry about volumes.
> Unix: No user visible concept of a volume
> Windows: VOLUME:\dir1\dir2\file
> VMS: VOLUME:[dir1.dir2]file
This has been worrying me for some years. The concept of "volume" has
different implications for different p
What's a dump stream actually going to look like? E.g.,
$a = [1, 2, 3];
print dump($a);
1: PMC PerlArray
2: 3 # element count
3: PMC PerlInt# [0]
4: 1 # value
5: PMC PerlInt# [1]
6: 2 # value
7: PMC PerlInt# [2]
8: 3 #
Sigh. My plan in starting this discussion was not to talk about
licenses. But it sounds like it's safer not to use Winfrotz if we don't
have to. I note that Games::Rezrov is "same terms as Perl itself"
license. However, in his effort to make Rezrov run fast, the author (by
his own admission) obfusc
Hi.
I get the following error when I try to parrot -o basic.pbc
merged_basic.pasm (in parrot 0.0.10 on Win32):
(error) line 164: parse error, unexpected INTC, expecting '\n'
The error appears to be in line 164 of stackops.pasm, which seems to be
missing a comma. I looked at CVSweb and it seems t
Hi,
After a weeks vacation, returning back to work on Ponie I have frequent
motivational problems because subversion is treating me so badly. (ie,
I don't want to change something because it is such a pain then to
commit it, I don't want to upgrade to latest parrot because it will
take a whole
From: Lars Balker Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Burnett, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> the idea of having a 'floor' op.
>I've implemented an op for floor on native numbers. Feel free to >give it
a whirl. (I'm not sure if floor(-0.0) is meant to
return -0.0 or not, but it does.)
29 matches
Mail list logo
