Re: [RfC] disable unused vtable entries

2003-08-06 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:33:31PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > In perl.perl6.internals, I wrote: > > When looking at classes/*.c struct _vtable temp_base_vtable {} by far > > the most vtable methods are unused or uncovered by opcodes: > > Some more details (vtbc.pl is below): > $ ./vtbc.pl |gr

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-06 Thread Jonathan Worthington
- Original Message - From: "Vladimir Lipskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:47 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist > > Is it a

repeat() not implemented in PerlInt

2003-08-06 Thread Michal Wallace
After running cvs up -d and then "make", a bunch of my tests broke. Here's the problem boiled down to the simplest case I can find: [~/pirate]: cat bug.imc .sub __main__ $P2 = new PerlInt $P2 = 1 $P3 = new PerlInt $P3 = 1 if $P2 == $P3 goto cmp1 c

[perl #23231] [PATCH] dynamic PMCs 1

2003-08-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #23231] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23231 > Attached is (if it wasn't stripped again ;-) a patch, that allows using dynamic PMCs

make install on Win32

2003-08-06 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Hi, Sorting out make install on Win32 wasn't as simple as I'd first guessed, but I'm getting there. I've now got it outputting 'correct' paths etc for Win32 to the makefile, and "tools/dev/install_files.pl" piping to "command" rather than "sh" on Win32 as well. Now I've hit the next snag - there

This Week's Perl 6 Summary

2003-08-06 Thread Piers Cawley
Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030703 "Ooh look, it's another Perl 6 summary. Doesn't that man ever take a holiday?" "I think he took one last month." "Is it in Esperanto this week?" "I don't think so." "Does Leon Brocard get a mention?" "It certainly looks th

Re: generic code generator? [was: subroutines and python status]

2003-08-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:09 PM -0400 8/4/03, Michal Wallace wrote: On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Stephen Thorne wrote: Thus the code generator is best suited to be in a language that can be run from within the parrot machine, otherwise statements like 'eval()' would not be possible without binding parrot to a non-portable