Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> # Please include the string: [perl #22765]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22765 >
> Hi,
> when playing with
> > I'm not yet sure whether it's worth having engine support for
> > specific exception type checking
>
> I think we would have:
> - Exception handler = Continuation
> - Exception object = a new class of some type[2]. When the system throughs
> an exception, it would attach 2 properties to the
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exception handlers really strike me as anonymous lexically scoped
> subroutines that get called with just one parameter--the exception
> object. As far as the engine should be concerned, when an exception
> is taken we just take a continuation with the addr
