[...] In the mean time, you can follow
along via the nntp server and the web-interface to it at
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language though the web
interface isn't threaded.
You can also read perl6-internals on google groups, which is threaded.
There is a link to it on t
At 06:05 PM 6/12/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Second, I see that the registers themselves are in the context structure.
I think this may be a good part of our speed problem with taking
continuations. Now, continuations should *not* restore the registers, so
this strikes me as an incorrect thi
"Clinton A. Pierce" wrote:
[snip]
> DEBUGGER:
> if one-stepping, DEBUG
> # Loop over break list
> if current statement is on global break list, DEBUG
> # End loop
> ret
No comment on your *particular* problem, but might I suggest that you
keep your b
> >Are the register stacks saved with the continuation?
>
> Yes, of course they are.
Er, yeah, um.. Everybody, forget everything I just said %-)
Luke
At 9:44 AM -0700 6/11/03, Steven Grady wrote:
I don't subscribe to perl6-internals, but I do read the archive
regularly. Are people aware that the archive hasn't been updated
since May 26?
http://archive.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Of course, you perl6-internals members probably aren't
At 5:01 PM -0600 6/12/03, Luke Palmer wrote:
> At 4:28 PM -0600 6/12/03, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Okay, at the moment I'm working on getting an implementation of
>> classes and objects working. I'm also taking a look at calling speed,
>> as I'd really like to not suck with our call times. :)
# New Ticket Created by Dan Sugalski
# Please include the string: [perl #22665]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22665 >
The stack rotate code doesn't check to see if any of the frames are
COW. Really ought t
> At 4:28 PM -0600 6/12/03, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > Okay, at the moment I'm working on getting an implementation of
> >> classes and objects working. I'm also taking a look at calling speed,
> >> as I'd really like to not suck with our call times. :)
> >>
> >> First off, the core stuff looks g
At 4:28 PM -0600 6/12/03, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Okay, at the moment I'm working on getting an implementation of
classes and objects working. I'm also taking a look at calling speed,
as I'd really like to not suck with our call times. :)
First off, the core stuff looks good. I'd not really looked
> Okay, at the moment I'm working on getting an implementation of
> classes and objects working. I'm also taking a look at calling speed,
> as I'd really like to not suck with our call times. :)
>
> First off, the core stuff looks good. I'd not really looked at it
> until now, but now that I ha
Okay, at the moment I'm working on getting an implementation of
classes and objects working. I'm also taking a look at calling speed,
as I'd really like to not suck with our call times. :)
First off, the core stuff looks good. I'd not really looked at it
until now, but now that I have, well...
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jonathan Sillito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Here is another suggestion (I think I mentioned this in another email) we
>> could support a few different types of continuations. The simplest
>> continuation could be just a saved return address (i.e.
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
You have to used global labels for subroutines, then all is fine.
But being able to craft input that causes IMCC to segfault (actually
any form of segfault) is bad on principle, isn't it?
For sure. But this i
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:15:21AM +, Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
> Causes IMCC to segfault. Asking IMCC to generate pasm produces reasonable
> code:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > .sub _main
> > .su
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:41:12PM +0530, Raghu wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am try to integrate a Perl application into Java. I am using Perl5.6.1
>
> with jdk1.4 on solaris2.8.
> I am using JNI to access the perl api's to perform this. The C
> application runs fine, but the Java application core dumps at o
Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want something to play with, update the languages/BASIC/compiler
> tree and run the chess program.
Nice graphics.
> ..\..\imcc\imcc.exe TARG_test.imc
Please check out the latest imcc changes. Spilling performance is vastly
improved now.
Hi ,
I am try to integrate a Perl application into Java. I am using Perl5.6.1
with jdk1.4 on solaris2.8.
I am using JNI to access the perl api's to perform this. The C
application runs fine, but the Java application core dumps at one
particular function perl_parse(...). I have gone thru some of th
Jonathan Sillito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is another suggestion (I think I mentioned this in another email) we
> could support a few different types of continuations. The simplest
> continuation could be just a saved return address (i.e. an opcode_t*).
I'm fine with that, if its addition
Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .sub _main
> .sub dummy
> call inner1
> call inner2
You have to used global labels for subroutines, then all is fine.
leo
19 matches
Mail list logo
