If you want something to play with, update the languages/BASIC/compiler
tree and run the chess program.
perl compile.pl samples\chess.bas
..\..\imcc\imcc.exe TARG_test.imc
(modify for your path delimiters, executable extensions, etc... use a
recent version of imcc too)
I spent t
Yep, that did it! Thanks!
Brian
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 23:11, Paul Fisher wrote:
> Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Are you running RHL 9? If so, unset LANG and try rebuilding.
>
> Default RHL 9 w/ LANG="en_US.UTF-8":
>
> $ make jit_cpu.c
> /usr/bin/perl jit2
# New Ticket Created by "Clinton A. Pierce"
# Please include the string: [perl #22645]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22645 >
I'm exploring IMCC's ability to have nested subs. The following code:
.sub _mai
Jonathan Sillito writes:
> Here is another suggestion (I think I mentioned this in another email) we
> could support a few different types of continuations. The simplest
> continuation could be just a saved return address (i.e. an opcode_t*).
> This would be roughly as lightweight as the current
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jonathan Sillito wrote:
>
> Why not just leave the old behaviour?
> IMHO[1]:
> - Make a new class based on Continuations
> - invokecc and such are based on it
[snip]
> [1] I don't know too much about all the HL stuff. But anyway, some
> languages m
I don't subscribe to perl6-internals, but I do read the archive
regularly. Are people aware that the archive hasn't been updated
since May 26?
http://archive.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Of course, you perl6-internals members probably aren't responsible
for this archive, but I don't kno
Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that one possibility is to use the supplied malloc.c file, which
> has a memalign implementation.
Yep.
> It comes from this section of include/parrot/pobj.h:
> /*
> * arenas are constant sized ~32 byte object size, ~128K objects
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Leopold Toetsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jonathan Sillito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch converts parrot to a continuation passing style.
>
> You seem to be changing current tests WRT invoke - does invoke still
> work as it did? Or more specifi
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a p6i backlog, so I don't know if this is already solved.
> However, on a fresh CVS checkout on FreeBSD I can't compile:
> platform.c:167: #error "generic platform without memalign"
> What's the solution?
There are some, probably all do involv
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I've got a p6i backlog, so I don't know if this is already solved.
> However, on a fresh CVS checkout on FreeBSD I can't compile:
>
> cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith
> -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite
I've got a p6i backlog, so I don't know if this is already solved.
However, on a fresh CVS checkout on FreeBSD I can't compile:
cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith
-Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Winline -W -Wno-unused
This patch is necessary to get parrot to build with perl 5.00503 -- the
mode argument to mkdir() wasn't optional back then.
--- parrot-current/config/gen/makefiles/root.in Fri May 30 11:00:09 2003
+++ parrot-andy/config/gen/makefiles/root.inWed Jun 11 15:26:29 2003
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
PERL =
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:00:07PM -0700, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerome Vouillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The python interpreter seems rather slow. I get these numbers with the
> > Ocaml bytecode interpreter.
> >
> > mistral-jerome:/tmp > time
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:59:50PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > mistral-jerome:/tmp > time python test.py
> > > python test.py 2,59s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 2,582 total
> > > mistral-jerome:/tmp > ocamlc -o tst test.ml; time ./tst
> > > ./tst 0,14s user 0,00s system 106% cp
Jonathan Sillito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch converts parrot to a continuation passing style.
You seem to be changing current tests WRT invoke - does invoke still
work as it did? Or more specifically: Do imcc tests and perl6 test still
pass?
> I am not satisfied with the time taken t
15 matches
Mail list logo
