On my system, the perl takes 2.24 second and the python takes 3.76 seconds.
You are correct that the 2 versions I send out earlier are *very*
different. I started from two places, the primes.pasm which I converted
to C and perl versions and a pre-existing primes.py and primes.c that I
converted
Hello!
Benchmarks are idiosyncratic and devious and I thank you for starting a
comparison whose results interest me greatly. =]
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 10:03, Tupshin Harper wrote:
> [...]and some are in languages I am less then fluent in
> (last touched any flavor of assembly in 1985, and barely
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think --optimize alone is busted.
>
>
> Probably my fault, when introducing this option. I did test only with
> --debugging.
No no no. You're supposed to test with -march=... -fomit-frame-pointe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think --optimize alone is busted.
Probably my fault, when introducing this option. I did test only with
--debugging.
leo
Simon Glover (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #21288]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21288 >
The attached patch changes the initialization of variou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:53:11PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Did you have an optimized parrot compile?
( make progclean ; perl Configure.pl ... --optimize ; make -s)
--optimize may be broken. I tried it with a clean parrot source and
The ellipses should have
Tupshin Harper wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Did you have an optimized parrot compile?
( make progclean ; perl Configure.pl ... --optimize ; make -s)
No I hadn't, but I just did, using those exact commands(no additional
options to Configure.pl), and had no perceivable performance change
u
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [perl #21288]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21288 >
The attached patch changes the initialization of various function
pointers in packfil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:03:40AM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote:
FYI...all three used the identical algorithm taken from the primes.pasm
example complete with labels and gotos(makes for very disconcerting perl
code). Startup times and printf times were not significant
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Did you have an optimized parrot compile?
( make progclean ; perl Configure.pl ... --optimize ; make -s)
No I hadn't, but I just did, using those exact commands(no additional
options to Configure.pl), and had no perceivable performance change
using any of the parrot va
At 05:04 PM 2/17/2003 -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote:
So I'm gonna take a look at the native calling functionality of parrot to
see about access to an XML parser.
Taking a look at the pxs example (is this the right place to be looking?),
and I'm having problems compiling PQt.C per it's own instruc
At 02:14 AM 2/18/2003 -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote:
A number of the language examples in parrot seem to not work as well as
they once might have(or should).
cola:
doesn't compile
bison -v -y -d -o parser.c cola.y
cola.y:75.7-11: type redeclaration for class_decl
cola.y:84.7-11: type redeclaration
Tupshin Harper wrote:
A number of the language examples in parrot seem to not work as well as
they once might have(or should).
The learning curve to get familiar something like parrot is much easier
if things like this just work. So, if anybody cares, here's the list of
issues I ran into in th
Tupshin Harper wrote:
In case anyone is interested.
Always :)
Did you have an optimized parrot compile?
( make progclean ; perl Configure.pl ... --optimize ; make -s)
-Tupshin
Code available if anybody cares.
Yes please.
TIA,
leo
Jürgen Bömmels (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #21277]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21277 >
Hello,
Here is an extension to my first macro suppor
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:14:39AM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote:
> Befunge-93:
> Trivial, but a fresh cvs checkout has a lingering empty Befunge-93
> directory.
This is a CVS annoyance. It's a good idea to add:
checkout -P
update -d -P
to your ~/.cvsrc. You won't get empty directories if you use
In case anyone is interested.
On a whim I took the primes.pasm example from the parrot examples page
and converted it to both c and perl5, with _interesting_ results.
Timing all three with a max of 100,000 produced the following results:
c -primes.c(lickety split):
real0m7.710s
user
Attached is a pod
- describing the current existing stack calling convention
- proposing a syntax for parrot's NCI calling convention.
Comments ... welcome,
leo
=head1 NAME
IMCC - calling conventions
=head1 VERSION
=over 4
=item 0.1 intital proposal
=back
=head1 OVERVIEW
This document desc
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #21277]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21277 >
Hello,
Here is an extension to my first macro support patch (#21033 already
applied).
A number of the language examples in parrot seem to not work as well as
they once might have(or should).
The learning curve to get familiar something like parrot is much easier
if things like this just work. So, if anybody cares, here's the list of
issues I ran into in the languages directory:
Tupshin Harper:
# If pxs is truly obsolete, please trash it ;-).
I'm not confident enough about PXS to trash it, but I've commented a few
files appropriately.
--Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@roles=map {"Parrot $_"} qw(embedding regexen Configure)
>How do you "test" this 'God' to "prove" it is w
Thank you very much. That example works for me.
One question: What is the preferred way of telling parrot about .so
files like libPQt.so.
Is there some location within the parrot hierarchy where these can be
put to be dynamically found? If not, should there be?
If pxs is truly obsolete, please t
Tupshin Harper wrote:
Taking a look at the pxs example (is this the right place to be
looking?), and I'm having problems compiling PQt.C per it's own
instructions.
I don't know, what's up with pxs, but AFAIK this is obsolete and
replaced by the NCI (native call interface).
Attached is the
# New Ticket Created by Cal Henderson
# Please include the string: [perl #21276]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21276 >
hi,
this patch fixes some formatting issues that cause docs/dev/rx.dev to
incorrectly
24 matches
Mail list logo
